I have tried running these multiple times locally and on CI with the exact same seed as a failing one and without that seed too, also with these individual specs split into their own PRs. Nothing is failing, so I don't really know what else I can do if there is no consistent reproduction, so re-enabling for now.
A translator noted that this string is odd: "We'll email you immediately
if you haven't read the thing we're emailing you about." We show this
note in the user profile when the user has chosen to be emailed "only
when away" and the site has `email_time_window_mins` off. The message
essentially says that "only when away" in this particular site's config
means "Always".
I think it is best to show no description here. In an ideal world, the
"Only when away" option shouldn't be there when `email_time_window_mins`
is off. But it is rare to choose that override, and adding proper support
for that use case would be complicated.
This sometimes got the Uncategorized category and
sometimes not, because it also had a topic count
of 0 same as the "fun" category. Giving the "fun"
category a higher count will fix the issue.
* FIX: Use Category.secured(guardian) for hashtag datasource
Follow up to comments in #19219, changing the category
hashtag datasource to use Category.secured(guardian) instead
of Site.new(guardian).categories here since the latter does
more work for not much benefit, and the query time is the
same. Also eliminates some Hash -> Model back and forth
busywork. Add some more specs too.
* FIX: Server-side hashtag lookup cooking user loading
When we were using the PrettyText.options.currentUser
and parsing back and forth with JSON for the hashtag
lookups server-side, we had a bug where the user's
secure categories were not loaded since we never actually
loaded a User model from the database, only parsed it
from JSON.
This commit fixes the issue by instead using the
PretyText.options.userId and looking up the user directly
from the database when calling hashtag_lookup via the
PrettyText::Helpers code when cooking server-side. Added
the missing spec to check for this as well.
* FEATURE: Show similar users when penalizing a user
Moderators will be notified if other users with the same IP address
exist before penalizing a user.
* FEATURE: Allow staff to penalize multiple users
This allows staff members to suspend or silence multiple users belonging
to the same person.
This helper is intended only for dev purposes. It allows you to pause a test while still being able to interact with the browser.
Usage:
```
it "works" do
visit("/")
pause_test
expect(page).to have_css(".foo")
end
```
If configured, this will be used for static JS assets which are stored on S3. This can be useful if you want to use different CDN providers/configuration for Uploads and JS
This commit allows us to type # in the UI and present autocomplete
results immediately with the following logic for the topic composer,
and reversed for the chat composer:
* Categories the user can access and has not muted sorted by `topic_count`
* Tags the user can access and has not muted sorted by `topic_count`
* Chat channels the user is a member of sorted by `messages_count`
So in effect, we allow searching for hashtags without a search term.
To do this we add a new `search_without_term` to each data source so
each one can define how it wants to handle this logic.
This new site setting replaces the
`enable_experimental_sidebar_hamburger` and `enable_sidebar` site
settings as the sidebar feature exits the experimental phase.
Note that we're replacing this without depreciation since the previous
site setting was considered experimental.
Internal Ref: /t/86563
This prevents long inbox names from causing issues in the dropdown on /my/messages and tries a new mobile layout that makes better use of the available space:
When looking up hashtags which were conflicting (e.g.
management::tag and management) where the user did
not have permission for one of them, we ended up returning
the one they did have permission to (e.g. the tag) twice
because of the way the lookup fallback code worked. This
fixes the issue, and another related one where the
::type was not added to the found item's .ref, and
so the hashtag replacement on the client was not working
correctly.
In this PR, we introduced an option, that when all authenticators are disabled, but backup codes still exists, user can authenticate with those backup codes. This was reverted as this is not expected behavior.
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/18982
Instead, when the last authenticator is deleted, backup codes should be deleted as well. Because this disables 2fa, user is asked to confirm that action by typing text.
In addition, UI for 2fa preferences was refreshed.
When under extremely high load, it has been observed that updating the categories table when creating a new topic can become a bottleneck.
This change will reduce the two updates to one when a new topic is created within a category, and therefore should help with performance when under extremely high load.
* FIX: Save only visible fields from the sidebar page
* FIX: Do not reset seen popups when set to false
If the option was unchecked, but it was not changed at all by the user
it was still sent to the server as a 'false' value which reset all seen
popups. This removes that behavior and resetting the list of seen popups
must be done using the "skip new user tips" button.
The default behavior for Rails is to vary the response of an endpoint based on the `Accept:` header, and therefore it returns a `Vary:` header on responses. This instructs browsers and intermediate proxies to key their caches based on the value of the request's `Accept` header. In some cases (e.g. Akamai), the presence of a `Vary` header is enough to prevent caching entirely.
This commit restructures the Rails route definitions so that:
1. The "format" segment of the route is 'required'
2. The "format" segment of the route is constrained to a single value (e.g. `js` or `css`)
Now that the routes are guaranteed to have a `:format` segment, Rails will always prioritize that over the `Accept` header, and will therefore omit the `Vary` header.
Request specs are also added to test this behaviour for both stylesheets and theme-javascripts.
That was a weird UX (why hide the preferences navigation?) and a deprecated implementation (manually rendering a template into a named outlet)
This PR replaces it with an inline component.
When finding the candidates for `Topic.similar_to`, we will now ignore
topics in categories where `Category#search_priority` has been set to
ignore and also topics in categories which the user has specifically
muted.
Internal Ref: /t/87132
The repro for the bug:
Add a post with a mention of a user
Post another post below
Delete the first post with a mention
Reload the page and try to attempt to view hidden reply
- Only display topic actions (reply / notification bell) under correct circumstances (multiple posts present, etc)
- Moves topic actions from `glimmer-topic-timeline` into `glimmer-topic-timeline/container` where it should be
* FEATURE: Enforce mention limits for chat messages
The first part of these changes adds a new setting called `max_mentions_per_chat_message`, which skips notifications when the message contains too many mentions. It also respects the `max_users_notified_per_group_mention` setting
and skips notifications if expanding a group mention would exceed it.
We also include a new component to display JIT warning for these limits to the user while composing a message.
* Simplify ignoring/muting filter in chat_notifier
* Post-send warnings for unsent warnings
* Improve pluralization
* Address review feedback
* Fix test
* Address second feedback round
* Third round of feedback
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Note that we don't have a database table and a model for post mentions yet, and I decided to implement it without adding one to avoid heavy data migrations. Still, we may want to add such a model later, that would be convenient, we have such a model for mentions in chat.
Note that status appears on all mentions on all posts in a topic except of the case when you just posted a new post, and it appeared on the bottom of the topic. On such posts, status won't be shown immediately for now (you'll need to reload the page to see the status). I'll take care of it in one of the following PRs.
