In an effort to modernize our codebase to the latest Ember version we have selected the Topic Timeline as a candidate to be refactored. The topic timeline component was originally built with `Widgets` and this PR will upgrade it to `Glimmer Components`.
The refactored timeline is hidden by default behind a group flag, `SiteSetting.enable_experimental_topic_timeline_groups`. Being part of a group included in this site setting will make the new timeline available for testing.
## Other points of interest
This PR introduces a `Draggable Modifier` available to all components, which will take the place of the existing _drag functionality_ exclusive to widgets.
It can be included like so:
```
{{draggable didStartDrag=@didStartDrag didEndDrag=@didEndDrag dragMove=@dragMove }}
```
Update failing spec which previously used non-staff user to create
hidden posts.
Also add new spec for non-staff use cases to prevent future
regressions.
In some cases (e.g. user notification emails) we
are passing an excerpted/stripped version of the
post HTML to Email::Styles, at which point the
<span> elements surrounding the hashtag text have
been stripped. This caused an error when trying to
remove that element to replace the text.
Instead we can just remove all elements inside
a.hashtag-cooked and replace with the raw #hashtag
text which will work in more cases.
The centralization helps in reducing code duplication in our code base
and more importantly, centralizing logic for guardian checks into a
single spot.
Currently this is how the navigation structure looks like on the messages page:
#### When personal inbox route is active
```
Inbox
sent
new
unread
archive
Group 1 Inbox
Group 2 Inbox
Tags
<Plugin Outlet>
```
#### When group inbox route is active
```
Inbox
Group 1 Inbox
sent
new
unread
archive
Group 2 Inbox
Tags
<Plugin Outlet>
```
With the existing structure, it is very easy for plugins to add additional navigation links by using the plugin outlet. In the redesigned user page navigation, the navigation structure on the messages page has been changed to look like this:
#### When personal inbox route is active
```
---dropdown-------
| Inbox | Latest | Sent | New | Unread | Archive
------------------
```
#### When group inbox route is active
```
---dropdown------
| Group 1 Inbox | Latest | New | Unread | Archive
-----------------
```
With the new navigation structure, we can no longer rely on a simple plugin outlet to extend the navigation structure. Instead, we will need to introduce a plugin API for plugins to extend the navigation structure. The API needs to allow two things to happen:
1. The plugin API needs to allow the plugin to register an item in the drop down and for the registered item to be "selected" whenever the plugin's routes are active.
1. The plugin API needs to allow the plugin to register items into the secondary horizontal navigation menu beside the drop down.
While trying to design the API, I struggle with trying to determine the "context" of the current route. In order words, it was hard to figure out if the current user is viewing the personal inbox, group inbox or tags. This is attributed to the fact that our current routing structure looks like this:
```
this.route(
"userPrivateMessages",
{ path: "/messages", resetNamespace: true },
function () {
this.route("new");
this.route("unread");
this.route("archive");
this.route("sent");
this.route("warnings");
this.route("group", { path: "group/:name" });
this.route("groupArchive", { path: "group/:name/archive" });
this.route("groupNew", { path: "group/:name/new" });
this.route("groupUnread", { path: "group/:name/unread" });
this.route("tags");
this.route("tagsShow", { path: "tags/:id" });
}
);
```
In order to provide context of the current route, we currently require all child routes under the `userPrivateMessages` route to set a `pmView` property on the `userPrivateMessages` controller. If the route requires additional context like the group currently active on the group inbox routes, the child routes would then have to set the `group` property on the `userPrivateMessages` controller. The problems with this approach is that we end up with many permutations of state on the `userPrivateMessages` controller and have to always clean up the state when navigating between the child routes. Basically, data is flowing upwards from the child routes into the parent controller which is not an ideal approach because we cannot easily determine where the "data" setup happens. Instead, we want to follow something similar to the "Data down, actions up" pattern where data flows downwards. In this commit, the `userPrivateMessages` routes have been changed to look like this:
```
this.route(
"userPrivateMessages",
{ path: "/messages", resetNamespace: true },
function () {
this.route("user", { path: "/" }, function () {
this.route("new");
this.route("unread");
this.route("archive");
this.route("sent");
this.route("warnings");
});
this.route("group", { path: "group/:name" }, function () {
this.route("archive");
this.route("new");
this.route("unread");
});
this.route("tags", { path: "/tags" }, function () {
this.route("show", { path: ":id" });
});
}
);
```
Basically, we group the child routes based on the purpose each route servers. User inbox routes are grouped together while group inbox routes are grouped together. A big benefit of this is that now have a different Ember router and controller for each grouping of child routes. The context of the current route is then tied directly to the route name instead of requiring each child route to set an attribute on the parent controller.
The second reason for why we needed to group the child routes together is because it allows us to pass the responsibility of rendering the secondary navigation links to the child routes. In this commit, we use the `{{in-element}}` modifier in the child route to render the secondary navigation links.
```
---dropdown--------
| Group 1 Inbox | Latest | New | Unread | Archive
------------------------
<parent template> <horizontal secondary navigation links element>
```
This means that each child route with its own model and context can then handle the responsibility of rendering the secondary navigation links without having to pass its context up to the `userPrivateMessages` controller. While this should have simplified by the `userPrivateMessages` controller, we can't do that in this commit because our current navigation structure requires all links for all message inboxes to remain on screen at all times. Once we fully transition to the redesigned user menu navigation, we will be able to greatly simplify things around the routes and controllers for `userPrivateMessages`.
In an ideal world, we would deprecate the old routes but I have done a quick search through all known plugins and no plugins are currently relying on those routes. There is a chance we could break plugins here but I'll like to see some smoke first before committing to the effort of deprecating client side routes.
Users who can access the review queue can claim a pending reviewable(s) which means that the claimed reviewable(s) can only be handled by the user who claimed it. Currently, we show claimed reviewables in the user menu, but this can be annoying for other reviewers because they can't do anything about a reviewable claimed by someone. So this PR makes sure that we only show in the user menu reviewables that are claimed by nobody or claimed by the current user.
Internal topic: t/77235.
This PR adds separate notification indicators for PMs and reviewables that have arrived since the last time the user opened the notifications menu.
The PM indicator is the strongest one of all three indicators followed by the reviewable indicator and then finally the blue indicator. This means that if there's a new PM and a new reviewable, then the PM indicator will be shown.
Meta topic: https://meta.discourse.org/t/no-green-or-red-notification-bubbles/242783?u=osama.
Internal topic: t/82995.
Fixes broken behaviour of arrow buttons for certain users as the interval to scroll menu can be cancelled before the scrolling actually happens.
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
This is closer to git's redirect following behaviour. We prevented git
following redirects when we clone in order to prevent SSRF attacks.
Follow-up-to: 291bbc4fb9
regression commit: bec76f937c
In case when the user navigates away between async actions that code would error out on a missing element. This adds a simple sanity check.
`ember-cached-decorator-polyfill` uses a Babel transformation to apply this polyfill in core. Adding that Babel transformation to themes and plugins will be complex, so we use this to patch it at runtime. This can be removed once `@glimmer/tracking` is updated to a version
with native `@cached` support.
1. "What Goes Up Must Come Down" – if you subscribe to message bus, make sure you also unsubscribe
2. When you unsubscribe - remove only your subscription, not **all** subscriptions on given channel
`Route#render` and `Route#renderTemplate` have been deprecated and are removed in Ember 4.x (see: https://deprecations.emberjs.com/v3.x#toc_route-render-template)
The templates of modified routes in this PR are already automatically inserted into `{{outlet}}`s.
While load testing our user creation code path in production, we
identified that executing the DB statement to update the `Group#user_count` column within a
transaction is creating a bottleneck for us. This is because the
creation of a user and addition of the user to the relevant groups are
done in a transaction. When we execute the DB statement to update
`Group#user_count` for the relevant group, a row level lock is held
until the transaction completes. This row level lock acts like a global
lock when the server is creating users that will be added to the same
group in quick succession.
Instead of updating the counter cache within a transaction which the
default ActiveRecord `counter_cache` option does, we simply update the
counter cache outside of the committing transaction.
Co-authored-by: Rafael dos Santos Silva <xfalcox@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rafael dos Santos Silva <xfalcox@gmail.com>
To theme/plugin developers, the process is the same as for overriding non-colocated component templates. Once merged, this should allow us to seamlessly convert all of core's component templates to be colocated.
`reviewable.chat_channel` is a plain javascript object from the server's JSON response. We need to turn it into a true `ChatChannel` object before passing to `<ChatChannelTitle>`
This commit also converts `<ReviewableChatMessage>` to a Glimmer component
The akismet plugin defines the `reviewable-akismet-post` component using a template under `discourse/templates/components/reviewable-akismet-post.hbs` without an associated `.js` file. The change to our resolution logic in c1397670 wasn't considering this.
When doing local oneboxes we sometimes want to allow
SVGs in the final preview HTML. The main case currently
is for the new cooked hashtags, which include an SVG
icon.
SVGs will be included in local oneboxes via `ExcerptParser` _only_
if they have the d-icon class, and if the caller for `post.excerpt`
specifies the `keep_svg: true` option.
It used to fail without displaying an error message if no upload
extensions were authorized. This also disables the button in the
first place to avoid displaying an error to the user (the error
will be displayed only when drag and dropping a file).
Adds stats for API and user API requests similar to regular page views.
This comes with a new report to visualize API requests per day like the
consolidated page views one.
In the past, the result of template compilation would be stored directly in `Ember.TEMPLATES`. Following the move to more modern ember-cli-based compilation, templates are now compiled to es6 modules. To handle forward/backwards compatibility during these changes we had logic in `discourse-boot` which would extract templates from the es6 modules and store them into the legacy-style `Ember.TEMPLATES` object.
This commit removes that shim, and updates our resolver to fetch templates directly from es6 modules. This is closer to how 'vanilla' Ember handles template resolution. We still have a lot of discourse-specific logic, but now it is centralised in one location and should be easier to understand and normalize in future.
This commit should not introduce any behaviour change.
This change only affects the redesign user page navigation menu. The
dismiss button was incorrectly positioned below the user notifications
stream. A side effect of this is that it affected our infinite loading
code for the notifications stream.
No tests have been added in this commit as we have yet to quite figure
out how we can reliabily test for behaviours which requires us to scroll
the page.
