Simo Sorce 03fc5c3d73 Fix ticket checks when using either s4u2proxy or a delegated krbtgt
When using s4u2proxy the only ticket we can access via direct krb5 calls is
the HTTP/ ticket which was saved in the ccache as evidence ticket.
This ticket is later used by GSSAPI as evidence to obtain an ldap ticket.

This works by chance, we shouldn't use calls to get_credentials just to
verify ticket expiration dates, but I realize this is a limitation of the
current krbV bindings and we have no other way around at the moment.

Checking the HTTP/ ticket will fail in case a krbtgt is fully delegated to
us. In that case the ccache will contain only a krbtgt, so as a fallback
we check that.

Checking the ldap/ ticket is never really useful. When s4u2proxy is used,
trying to check the ldap/ ticket will fail because we do not have it yet
on the first authentication before a session is estalished, and doing it
later is not useful.

When we have a krbtgt we could go and grap a ldap/ ticket directy, but
again that makes little sense. In general all tickets will have the same
expiration date (which deopends on the original krbtgt) so checking one
is sufficient.

Fixes: http://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2472
2012-03-01 00:56:01 -05:00
2010-12-20 17:19:53 -05:00
2012-02-28 13:03:22 -05:00
2012-01-20 08:13:44 +01:00
2011-08-26 08:26:08 -04:00
2012-02-14 18:03:45 -05:00
2012-02-07 15:52:02 +01:00
2012-02-29 18:30:03 -05:00
2010-12-20 17:19:53 -05:00
2012-02-28 23:58:51 -05:00
2010-12-20 17:19:53 -05:00
2010-12-20 17:19:53 -05:00
2011-11-22 23:57:10 -05:00
2012-02-29 18:30:03 -05:00

                               IPA Server

  What is it?
  -----------

  For efficiency, compliance and risk mitigation, organizations need to
  centrally manage and correlate vital security information including:

    * Identity (machine, user, virtual machines, groups, authentication
      credentials)
    * Policy (configuration settings, access control information)
    * Audit (events, logs, analysis thereof) 

  Since these are not new problems. there exist many approaches and
  products focused on addressing them. However, these tend to have the
  following weaknesses:

    * Focus on solving identity management across the enterprise has meant
      less focus on policy and audit.
    * Vendor focus on Web identity management problems has meant less well
      developed solutions for central management of the Linux and Unix
      world's vital security info. Organizations are forced to maintain
      a hodgepodge of internal and proprietary solutions at high TCO.
    * Proprietary security products don't easily provide access to the
      vital security information they collect or manage. This makes it
      difficult to synchronize and analyze effectively. 

  The Latest Version
  ------------------

  Details of the latest version can be found on the IPA server project
  page under <http://www.freeipa.org/>.

  Documentation
  -------------

  The most up-to-date documentation can be found at
  <http://freeipa.org/page/Documentation/>.

  Quick Start
  -----------

  To get started quickly, start here:
  <https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/wiki/QuickStartGuide>

  Licensing
  ---------

  Please see the file called COPYING.

  Contacts
  --------

     * If you want to be informed about new code releases, bug fixes,
       security fixes, general news and information about the IPA server
       subscribe to the freeipa-announce mailing list at
       <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-interest/>.

     * If you have a bug report please submit it at:
       <https://bugzilla.redhat.com>

     * If you want to participate in actively developing IPA please
       subscribe to the freeipa-devel mailing list at
       <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel/> or join
       us in IRC at irc://irc.freenode.net/freeipa
Description
No description provided
Readme 58 MiB
Languages
Python 75.7%
JavaScript 10.9%
C 10.8%
Roff 1.1%
Makefile 0.4%
Other 1.1%