mirror of
https://github.com/grafana/grafana.git
synced 2025-02-25 18:55:37 -06:00
* Docs: Updates docs for redux framework * Update contribute/style-guides/redux.md Co-Authored-By: Marcus Olsson <olsson.e.marcus@gmail.com> * Update contribute/style-guides/redux.md Co-Authored-By: Marcus Olsson <olsson.e.marcus@gmail.com> * Update contribute/style-guides/redux.md Co-Authored-By: Marcus Olsson <olsson.e.marcus@gmail.com> * Update contribute/style-guides/redux.md Co-Authored-By: Marcus Olsson <olsson.e.marcus@gmail.com> * Docs: Updates after PR comments * Update redux.md
163 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
163 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
# Redux framework
|
|
|
|
To reduce the amount of boilerplate code used to create a strongly typed redux solution with actions, action creators, reducers and tests we've introduced a small framework around Redux.
|
|
|
|
`+` Much less boilerplate code
|
|
`-` Non Redux standard api
|
|
|
|
## Core functionality
|
|
|
|
### actionCreatorFactory
|
|
|
|
Used to create an action creator with the following signature
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
{ type: string , (payload: T): {type: string; payload: T;} }
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
where the `type` string will be ensured to be unique and `T` is the type supplied to the factory.
|
|
|
|
#### Example
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
export const someAction = actionCreatorFactory<string>('SOME_ACTION').create();
|
|
|
|
// later when dispatched
|
|
someAction('this rocks!');
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
// best practices, always use an interface as type
|
|
interface SomeAction {
|
|
data: string;
|
|
}
|
|
export const someAction = actionCreatorFactory<SomeAction>('SOME_ACTION').create();
|
|
|
|
// later when dispatched
|
|
someAction({ data: 'best practices' });
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
// declaring an action creator with a type string that has already been defined will throw
|
|
export const someAction = actionCreatorFactory<string>('SOME_ACTION').create();
|
|
export const theAction = actionCreatorFactory<string>('SOME_ACTION').create(); // will throw
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### reducerFactory
|
|
|
|
Fluent API used to create a reducer. (same as implementing the standard switch statement in Redux)
|
|
|
|
#### Example
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
interface ExampleReducerState {
|
|
data: string[];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const intialState: ExampleReducerState = { data: [] };
|
|
|
|
export const someAction = actionCreatorFactory<string>('SOME_ACTION').create();
|
|
export const otherAction = actionCreatorFactory<string[]>('Other_ACTION').create();
|
|
|
|
export const exampleReducer = reducerFactory<ExampleReducerState>(intialState)
|
|
// addMapper is the function that ties an action creator to a state change
|
|
.addMapper({
|
|
// action creator to filter out which mapper to use
|
|
filter: someAction,
|
|
// mapper function where the state change occurs
|
|
mapper: (state, action) => ({ ...state, data: state.data.concat(action.payload) }),
|
|
})
|
|
// a developer can just chain addMapper functions until reducer is done
|
|
.addMapper({
|
|
filter: otherAction,
|
|
mapper: (state, action) => ({ ...state, data: action.payload }),
|
|
})
|
|
.create(); // this will return the reducer
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Typing limitations
|
|
|
|
There is a challenge left with the mapper function that I can not solve with TypeScript. The signature of a mapper is
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
<State, Payload>(state: State, action: ActionOf<Payload>) => State;
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If you would to return an object that is not of the state type like the following mapper
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
mapper: (state, action) => ({ nonExistingProperty: ''}),
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Then you would receive the following compile error
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
[ts] Property 'data' is missing in type '{ nonExistingProperty: string; }' but required in type 'ExampleReducerState'. [2741]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
But if you return an object that is spreading state and add a non existing property type like the following mapper
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
mapper: (state, action) => ({ ...state, nonExistingProperty: ''}),
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Then you would not receive any compile error.
|
|
|
|
If you want to make sure that never happens you can just supply the State type to the mapper callback like the following mapper:
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
mapper: (state, action): ExampleReducerState => ({ ...state, nonExistingProperty: 'kalle' }),
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Then you would receive the following compile error
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
[ts]
|
|
Type '{ nonExistingProperty: string; data: string[]; }' is not assignable to type 'ExampleReducerState'.
|
|
Object literal may only specify known properties, and 'nonExistingProperty' does not exist in type 'ExampleReducerState'. [2322]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Test functionality
|
|
|
|
### reducerTester
|
|
|
|
Fluent API that simplifies the testing of reducers
|
|
|
|
#### Usage
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
reducerTester()
|
|
.givenReducer(someReducer, initialState)
|
|
.whenActionIsDispatched(someAction('reducer tests'))
|
|
.thenStateShouldEqual({ ...initialState, data: 'reducer tests' });
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Complex usage
|
|
Sometimes you encounter a `resulting state` that contains properties that are hard to compare, such as `Dates`, but you still want to compare that other props in state are correct.
|
|
|
|
Then you can use `thenStatePredicateShouldEqual` function on `reducerTester` that will return the `resulting state` so that you can expect upon individual properties..
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
reducerTester()
|
|
.givenReducer(someReducer, initialState)
|
|
.whenActionIsDispatched(someAction('reducer tests'))
|
|
.thenStatePredicateShouldEqual(resultingState => {
|
|
expect(resultingState.data).toEqual('reducer tests');
|
|
return true;
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### thunkTester
|
|
|
|
Fluent API that simplifies the testing of thunks.
|
|
|
|
#### Usage
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
const dispatchedActions = await thunkTester(initialState)
|
|
.givenThunk(someThunk)
|
|
.whenThunkIsDispatched(arg1, arg2, arg3);
|
|
|
|
expect(dispatchedActions).toEqual([someAction('reducer tests')]);
|
|
```
|