* Fix crash when reading VPC Peering Connection options.
This resolves the issue introduced in #8310.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <krzysztof.wilczynski@linux.com>
* Do not de-reference values when using Set().
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <krzysztof.wilczynski@linux.com>
* provider/aws: Update VPC Peering connect accept/request attributes
* change from type list to type set
* provider/aws: Update VPC Peering accept/requst options, tests
* errwrap some things
This commit is changing the `volumes` block from being computed to non-computed.
This change makes the Terraform configuration the source of truth about volumes
attached to the instance and therefore is able to correctly detect when a user
detaches a volume during an update.
One thing to be aware of is that if a user attached a volume out of band of an
instance controlled by Terraform, that volume will be detached upon the next
apply. The best thing to do is add a `volume` entry in the instance's
configuration of any volumes that were attached out of band.
This commit also explicitly detaches volumes from an instance before the
instance terminates. Most Block Storage volume drivers account for this
scenario internally, but there are a few that don't. This change is to support
those that don't.
In addition, when volumes are read by the instance, volumes configured in the
Terraform configuration are the source of truth. Previously, a call was being
made to OpenStack to provide the list of attached volumes.
It also adds a few new tests and fixes existing tests for various volume
attach-related scenarios.
* provider/aws: Refresh `aws_cloudwatch_event_target` from state on
`ResourceNotFoundException`
Fixes#6928
@radeksimko FYI :)
* Update resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_target.go
* provider/aws: Change Spot Fleet Request to allow a combination of
subnet_id and availability_zone
Also added a complete set of tests that reflect all of the use cases
that Amazon document
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/spot-fleet-examples.html
It is important to note there that Terraform will be suggesting that
users create multiple launch configurations rather than AWS's version of
combing values into CSV based parameters. This will ensure that we are
able to enforce the correct state
Also note that `associate_public_ip_address` now defaults to `false` - a migration has been
included in this PR to migration users of this functionality. This needs
to be noted in the changelog. The last part of changing functionality
here is waiting for the state of the request to become `active`. Before
we get to this state, we cannot guarantee that Amazon have accepted the
request or it could have failed validation.
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws
% TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_'
% 2 ↵
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/08/22 15:44:21 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_changePriceForcesNewRequest
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_changePriceForcesNewRequest (133.90s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_lowestPriceAzOrSubnetInRegion
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_lowestPriceAzOrSubnetInRegion (76.67s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_lowestPriceAzInGivenList
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_lowestPriceAzInGivenList (75.22s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_lowestPriceSubnetInGivenList
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_lowestPriceSubnetInGivenList (96.95s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_multipleInstanceTypesInSameAz
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_multipleInstanceTypesInSameAz (74.44s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_multipleInstanceTypesInSameSubnet
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_multipleInstanceTypesInSameSubnet (97.82s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_overriddingSpotPrice
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_overriddingSpotPrice (76.22s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_diversifiedAllocation
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_diversifiedAllocation (79.81s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_withWeightedCapacity
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_withWeightedCapacity (77.15s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_CannotUseEmptyKeyName
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_CannotUseEmptyKeyName (0.00s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 788.184s
```
* Update resource_aws_spot_fleet_request.go
* provider/aws: Refresh `aws_autoscaling_policy` from state on 404
Fixes#8386
When an Autoscaling Group Or an Autoscaling Group Policy has been
deleted manually, terraform was throwing an error as follows:
```
* aws_autoscaling_policy.increase: Error retrieving scaling policies: ValidationError: Group sandbox-logs-logstash-wxhsckky3ndpzd7b3kmyontngy not found
status code: 400, request id: 56a89814-6884-11e6-b3a8-d364cf04223b
```
We now refresh from state on a ValidationError - this is a common 4xx error according to AWS documentation http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AutoScaling/latest/APIReference/CommonErrors.html
```
%make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_disappears'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_disappears -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_disappears (203.61s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 203.633s
```
* Update resource_aws_autoscaling_policy.go
Replication Groups
In order to be able to restore a named snapshot as ElastiCache Cluster
or a Replication Group, the `snapshot_name` parameter was needed to be
passed. Changing the `snapshot_name` will force a new resource to be
created
```
```
resources
Fixes#8420
Adds the ability to update tags on the ALB resource as well as
supporting tags on `aws_alb_target_group`
```
ALB Tests:
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSALB_' 2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/08/23 19:30:16 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSALB_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSALB_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSALB_basic (67.18s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSALB_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSALB_tags (99.88s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSALB_noSecurityGroup
--- PASS: TestAccAWSALB_noSecurityGroup (62.49s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSALB_accesslogs
--- PASS: TestAccAWSALB_accesslogs (126.25s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 355.835s
```
```
ALB Target Group Tests:
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSALBTargetGroup_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/08/23 19:37:37 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSALBTargetGroup_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSALBTargetGroup_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSALBTargetGroup_basic (47.26s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSALBTargetGroup_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSALBTargetGroup_tags (81.01s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSALBTargetGroup_updateHealthCheck
--- PASS: TestAccAWSALBTargetGroup_updateHealthCheck (78.74s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 207.025s
```
`aws_elasticache_replication_group`
Fixes#8377
Now we can output the endpoint of the primary
```
resource "aws_elasticache_replication_group" "bar" {
replication_group_id = "tf-11111"
replication_group_description = "test description"
node_type = "cache.m1.small"
number_cache_clusters = 2
port = 6379
parameter_group_name = "default.redis2.8"
apply_immediately = true
}
output "primary_endpoint_address" {
value = "${aws_elasticache_replication_group.bar.primary_endpoint_address}"
}
```
This gives us:
```
% terraform apply
...................
aws_elasticache_replication_group.bar: Creation complete
Apply complete! Resources: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed.
Outputs:
primary_endpoint_address = tf-11111.d5jx4z.ng.0001.use1.cache.amazonaws.com
```
This was the addition of a computed field only so the basic test still works as expected:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSElasticacheReplicationGroup_basic' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/08/22 17:11:13 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSElasticacheReplicationGroup_basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSElasticacheReplicationGroup_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSElasticacheReplicationGroup_basic (741.71s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 741.735s
```
The AWS documentation tells us the following:
```
--replication-group-id (string)
The replication group identifier. This parameter is stored as a
lowercase string.
Constraints:
A name must contain from *1 to 20* alphanumeric characters or hyphens.
The first character must be a letter.
A name cannot end with a hyphen or contain two consecutive hyphens.
```
This is not correct and is causing users errors:
```
* aws_elasticache_replication_group.bar: Error creating Elasticache
* Replication Group: InvalidParameterValue: Replication group id should
* be no more than 16 characters.
status code: 400, request id:
```
Tuning the Validation from 20 to 16 characters to avoid user issues
This commit cleans up the google_compute_firewall resource to the Go
1.5+ style of not requiring map values to declare their type if they can
be inferred.
As part of Terraform 0.7.1 it was observed in issue #8345 that the state
migration for google_compute_firewall did not appear to be running,
causing a panic when an uninitialized member was read. This commit hooks
up the state migration function (which _was_ independently unit tested
but was not actually in place).
There is currently no good test framework for this, I will address this
issue in a future RFC.
