The work integrated in hashicorp/terraform#6322 silently broke the
ability to use remote state correctly. This commit adds a fix for that,
making use of the work integrated in hashicorp/terraform#7124.
In order to deal with outputs which are complex structures, we use a
forked version of the flatmap package - the difference in the version
this commit vs the github.com/hashicorp/terraform/flatmap package is
that we add in an additional key for map counts which state requires.
Because we bypass the normal helper/schema mechanism, this is not set
for us.
Because of the HIL type checking of maps, values must be of a homogenous
type. This is unfortunate, as it means we can no longer refer to outputs
as:
${terraform_remote_state.foo.output.outputname}
Instead we had to bring them to the top level namespace:
${terraform_remote_state.foo.outputname}
This actually does lead to better overall usability - and the BC
breakage is made better by the fact that indexing would have broken the
original syntax anyway.
We also add a real-world test and assert against specific values. Tests
which were previously acceptance tests are now run as unit tests, so
regression should be identified at a much earlier stage.
This commit makes two changes: map interpolation can now read flatmapped
structures, such as those present in remote state outputs, and lists are
sorted by the index instead of the value.
The helper/schema framework for building providers previously validated
in all cases that each field being set in state was in the schema.
However, in order to support remote state in a usable fashion, the need
has arisen for the top level attributes of the resource to be created
dynamically. In order to still be able to use helper/schema, this commit
adds the capability to assign additional fields.
Though I do not forsee this being used by providers other than remote
state (and that eventually may move into Terraform Core rather than
being a provider), the usage and semantics are:
To opt into dynamic attributes, add a schema attribute named
"__has_dynamic_attributes", and make it an optional string with no
default value, in order that it does not appear in diffs:
"__has_dynamic_attributes": {
Type: schema.TypeString
Optional: true
}
In the read callback, use the d.UnsafeSetFieldRaw(key, value) function
to set the dynamic attributes.
Note that other fields in the schema _are_ copied into state, and that
the names of the schema fields cannot currently be used as dynamic
attribute names, as we check to ensure a value is not already set for a
given key.
This commit adds a flag to acceptance tests in order to make
appropriately named tests work during `make test` irrespective of the
TF_ACC environment variable. This should only be used on tests which are
known to be fast.
When using winrm config block, we had an address issue. This is no
longer a set but a list (As a list fits it more approp)
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm
TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicLinuxMachine
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicLinuxMachine (587.80s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_tags (554.53s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_updateMachineSize
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_updateMachineSize (612.52s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicWindowsMachine
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicWindowsMachine (765.90s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_windowsUnattendedConfig
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_windowsUnattendedConfig
(770.53s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_winRMConfig
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_winRMConfig (827.90s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm
4119.192s
```
false
Fixes#7035
A known issue in Terraform means that d.GetOk() on a bool which is false
will mean it doesn't get evaulated. Therefore, when people set
publicly_accessible to false, it will never get evaluated on the Create
We are going to make it default to false now
* provider/azurerm: DNS CNAME resource wasn't posting records
Azure changed the API for CNAME at some point and since then we haven't
been creating CNAME records. The API changes from []records to a single
record
This PR changes the schema for dns cnames to have a record parameter and
adds a deprecation warning around records. Talked with @jen20 on this
and we decided that it's currently broken and we should handle this as
part of 0.7 where there are other breaking changes
```
TF_LOG=1 make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm
TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord' 2>~/tf.log
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_basic (97.22s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_subdomain
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_subdomain (94.94s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_updateRecords
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_updateRecords (116.62s)
```
* Change DNS Records to removed rather than deprecated
Fixes#7053 where, when using `additional_unattend_config` in
`os_profile_windows_config` we got an error as follows:
```
azurerm_virtual_machine.test: [DEBUG] Error setting Virtual Machine
Storage OS Profile Windows Configuration: &errors.errorString{s:"Invalid
address to set: []string{\"os_profile_windows_config\", \"1534614206\",
\"additional_unattend_config\"}"}
```
The lineage of a state is an identifier shared by a set of states whose
serials are meaningfully comparable because they are produced by
progressive Refresh/Apply operations from the same initial empty state.
This is initialized as a type-4 (random) UUID when a new state is
initialized and then preserved on all other changes.
Since states before this change will not have lineage but users may wish
to set a lineage for an existing state in order to get the safety
benefits it will grow to imply, an empty lineage is considered to be
compatible with all lineages.
