Fixes#10729
Destruction ordering wasn't taking into account ordering implied through
variables across module boundaries.
This is because to build the destruction ordering we create a
non-destruction graph to determine the _creation_ ordering (to properly
flip edges). This creation graph we create wasn't including module
variables. This PR adds that transform to the graph.
Fixes#4645
This is something that never worked (even in legacy graphs), but as we
push forward towards encouraging multi-provider usage especially with
things like the Vault data source, I want to make sure we have this
right for 0.8.
When you have a config like this:
```
resource "foo_type" "name" {}
provider "bar" { attr = "${foo_type.name.value}" }
resource "bar_type" "name" {}
```
Then the destruction ordering MUST be:
1. `bar_type`
2. `foo_type`
Since configuring the client for `bar_type` requires accessing data from
`foo_type`. Prior to this PR, these two would be done in parallel. This
properly pushes forward the dependency.
There are more cases I want to test but this is a basic case that is
fixed.
This fixes: `TestContext2Apply_moduleDestroyOrder`
The new destroy graph wasn't properly creating edges that happened
_through_ an output, it was only created the edges for _direct_
dependents.
To fix this, the DestroyEdgeTransformer now creates the full transitive
list of destroy edges by walking all ancestors. This will create more
edges than are necessary but also will no longer miss resources through
an output.
terraform: more specific resource references
terraform: outputs need to know about the new reference format
terraform: resources w/o a config still have a referencable name
Fixes#9920
This was an issue caught with the shadow graph. Self references in
provisioners were causing a self-edge on destroy apply graphs.
We need to explicitly check that we're not creating an edge to ourself.
This is also how the reference transformer works.
