openvino/docs/OV_Runtime_UG/automatic_batching.md

Automatic Batching

(Automatic) Batching Execution

The Automatic-Batching is a preview of the new functionality in the OpenVINO™ toolkit. It performs on-the-fly automatic batching (i.e. grouping inference requests together) to improve device utilization, with no programming effort from the user. Inputs gathering and outputs scattering from the individual inference requests required for the batch happen transparently, without affecting the application code.

The feature primarily targets existing code written for inferencing many requests (each instance with the batch size 1). To obtain corresponding performance improvements, the application must be running many inference requests simultaneously. As explained below, the auto-batching functionality can be also used via a special virtual device.

Batching is a straightforward way of leveraging the GPU compute power and saving on communication overheads. The automatic batching is implicitly triggered on the GPU when the ov::hint::PerformanceMode::THROUGHPUT is specified for the ov::hint::performance_mode property for the compile_model or set_property calls. @sphinxdirective

.. tab:: C++

.. doxygensnippet:: docs/snippets/ov_auto_batching.cpp
   :language: cpp
   :fragment: [compile_model]

.. tab:: Python

.. doxygensnippet:: docs/snippets/ov_auto_batching.py
   :language: python
   :fragment: [compile_model]

@endsphinxdirective

Note

: You can disable the Auto-Batching (for example, for the GPU device) from being triggered by the ov::hint::PerformanceMode::THROUGHPUT. To do that, pass the ov::hint::allow_auto_batching set to false in addition to the ov::hint::performance_mode: @sphinxdirective

.. tab:: C++

.. doxygensnippet:: docs/snippets/ov_auto_batching.cpp
   :language: cpp
   :fragment: [compile_model_no_auto_batching]

.. tab:: Python

.. doxygensnippet:: docs/snippets/ov_auto_batching.py
   :language: python
   :fragment: [compile_model_no_auto_batching]

@endsphinxdirective

Alternatively, to enable the Auto-Batching in the legacy apps not akin to the notion of the performance hints, you may need to use the explicit device notion, such as 'BATCH:GPU'. In both cases (the throughput hint or explicit BATCH device), the optimal batch size selection happens automatically (the implementation queries the ov::optimal_batch_size property from the device, passing the model's graph as the parameter). The actual value depends on the model and device specifics, for example, on-device memory for the dGPUs. Auto-Batching support is not limited to the GPUs, but if a device does not support the ov::optimal_batch_size yet, it can work with the auto-batching only when specifying an explicit batch size, for example, "BATCH:(16)".

This automatic batch size selection assumes that the application queries the ov::optimal_number_of_infer_requests to create and run the returned number of requests simultaneously: @sphinxdirective

.. tab:: C++

.. doxygensnippet:: docs/snippets/ov_auto_batching.cpp
   :language: cpp
   :fragment: [query_optimal_num_requests]

.. tab:: Python

.. doxygensnippet:: docs/snippets/ov_auto_batching.py
   :language: python
   :fragment: [query_optimal_num_requests]

@endsphinxdirective If not enough inputs were collected, the timeout value makes the transparent execution fall back to the execution of individual requests. Configuration-wise, this is the AUTO_BATCH_TIMEOUT property. The timeout, which adds itself to the execution time of the requests, heavily penalizes the performance. To avoid this, in cases when your parallel slack is bounded, give the OpenVINO an additional hint.

For example, the application processes only 4 video streams, so there is no need to use a batch larger than 4. The most future-proof way to communicate the limitations on the parallelism is to equip the performance hint with the optional ov::hint::num_requests configuration key set to 4. For the GPU this will limit the batch size, for the CPU - the number of inference streams, so each device uses the ov::hint::num_requests while converting the hint to the actual device configuration options: @sphinxdirective

.. tab:: C++

.. doxygensnippet:: docs/snippets/ov_auto_batching.cpp
   :language: cpp
   :fragment: [hint_num_requests]

.. tab:: Python

.. doxygensnippet:: docs/snippets/ov_auto_batching.py
   :language: python
   :fragment: [hint_num_requests]

@endsphinxdirective

For the explicit usage, you can limit the batch size using "BATCH:GPU(4)", where 4 is the number of requests running in parallel.

Other Performance Considerations

To achieve the best performance with the Automatic Batching, the application should:

• Operate the number of inference requests that represents the multiple of the batch size. In the above example, for batch size 4, the application should operate 4, 8, 12, 16, etc. requests.
• Use the requests, grouped by the batch size, together. For example, the first 4 requests are inferred, while the second group of the requests is being populated. Essentially, the Automatic Batching shifts the asynchronousity from the individual requests to the groups of requests that constitute the batches.
• Balance the 'timeout' value vs the batch size. For example, in many cases having a smaller timeout value/batch size may yield better performance than large batch size, but with the timeout value that is not large enough to accommodate the full number of the required requests.
• Carefully apply the auto-batching to the pipelines. For example for the conventional video-sources->detection->classification flow, it is the most benefical to do auto-batching over the inputs to the detection stage. Whereas the resulting number of detections is usually fluent, which makes the auto-batching less applicable for the classification stage.

The following are limitations of the current implementations:

• Although less critical for the throughput-oriented scenarios, the load-time with auto-batching increases by almost 2x.
• Certain networks are not safely reshape-able by the "batching" dimension (specified as 'N' in the layouts terms). Also, if the batching dimension is not zero-th, the auto-batching is not triggered implicitly by the throughput hint.
• The explicit notion, for example, "BATCH:GPU", uses the relaxed dimensions tracking, often making the auto-batching possible. For example, this trick unlocks most detection networks.
• • When forcing the auto-batching via the explicit device notion, make sure to validate the results for correctness.
• Performance improvements happen at the cost of the memory footprint growth, yet the auto-batching queries the available memory (especially for the dGPUs) and limits the selected batch size accordingly.

Configuring the Automatic Batching

Following the OpenVINO convention for devices names, the batching device is named BATCH. The configuration options are as follows:

Parameter name	Parameter description	Default	Examples
"AUTO_BATCH_DEVICE"	Device name to apply the automatic batching and optional batch size in brackets	N/A	"BATCH:GPU" which triggers the automatic batch size selection. Another example is the device name (to apply the batching) with directly specified batch size "BATCH:GPU(4)"
"AUTO_BATCH_TIMEOUT"	timeout value, in ms	1000	you can reduce the timeout value (to avoid performance penalty when the data arrives too non-evenly) e.g. pass the "100", or in contrast make it large enough e.g. to accommodate inputs preparation (e.g. when it is serial process)

Testing Automatic Batching Performance with the Benchmark_App

The benchmark_app, that exists in both C++ and Python versions, is the best way to evaluate the performance of the Automatic Batching:

• The most straighforward way is performance hints:
• • benchmark_app -hint tput -d GPU -m 'path to your favorite model'
• Overriding the strict rules of implicit reshaping by the batch dimension via the explicit device notion:
• • benchmark_app -hint none -d BATCH:GPU -m 'path to your favorite model'
• Finally, overriding the automatically-deduced batch size as well:
• • $benchmark_app -hint none -d BATCH:GPU(16) -m 'path to your favorite model'

The last example is also applicable to the CPU or any other device that generally supports the batched execution.

See Also

Supported Devices