Detected by Coverity. the only case is caller passes a NULL to 'format' variable,
then taking 'if (format)' false branch, the function qcow2GetBackingStoreFormat
will directly dereferences the NULL 'format' pointer variable.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
Leak introduced in commit c1bc3d89.
Detected by valgrind:
==18462== 1,100 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 183 of 184
==18462== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==18462== by 0x4A06167: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:525)
==18462== by 0x4AADBB: virReallocN (memory.c:161)
==18462== by 0x4A975E: virBufferGrow (buf.c:117)
==18462== by 0x4A9D92: virBufferVasprintf (buf.c:290)
==18462== by 0x4A9EF7: virBufferAsprintf (buf.c:263)
==18462== by 0x429488: qemuBuildControllerDevStr (qemu_command.c:1993)
==18462== by 0x42C4B6: qemuBuildCommandLine (qemu_command.c:3803)
==18462== by 0x41A604: testCompareXMLToArgvHelper (qemuxml2argvtest.c:124)
==18462== by 0x41BB81: virtTestRun (testutils.c:141)
==18462== by 0x416DFF: mymain (qemuxml2argvtest.c:369)
==18462== by 0x41B277: virtTestMain (testutils.c:696)
==18462==
==18462== LEAK SUMMARY:
==18462== definitely lost: 1,100 bytes in 1 blocks
==18462== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
* src/qemu/qemu_command.c (qemuBuildCommandLine): Clean up on success.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
If the function lxcSetupLoopDevices(def, &nloopDevs, &loopDevs) failed,
the variable loopDevs will keep a initial NULL value, however, the
function VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(loopDevs[i]) will directly deref it.
This patch also fixes returning a bogous number of devices from
lxcSetupLoopDevices on an error path.
* rc/lxc/lxc_controller.c: fixed a null pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
Cppcheck detected a syntaxError on lxcDomainInterfaceStats.
* src/lxc/lxc_driver.c: fixed missing '{' in the function lxcDomainInterfaceStats.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* src/qemu/qemu_migration.c: if 'vmdef' is NULL, the function
virDomainSaveConfig still dereferences it, it doesn't make
sense, so should add return value check to make sure 'vmdef'
is non-NULL before calling virDomainSaveConfig, in addition,
in order to debug later, also should record error information
into log.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* src/qemu/qemu_process.c: Taking if (qemuDomainObjEndJob(driver, obj) == 0)
true branch then 'obj' is NULL, virDomainObjIsActive(obj) and
virDomainObjUnref(obj) will dereference NULL pointer.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* src/vmx/vmx.c: fix memory leak, 'def' has a initial value 'NULL', so
'goto cleanup' is perfected instead of adding a virConfFree before
'return NULL'.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
Leak present since introduction of remoteDomainBuildEventGraphics
in commit 987e31e.
* src/remote/remote_driver.c: fix memory leak.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* conf/domain_conf.c: allocate memory to def->redirdevs in
virDomainDefParseXML such as VIR_ALLOC_N(def->redirdevs, n),
however, virDomainDefFree(def) hasn't released these memory.
* Detected in valgrind run:
==19820== 209 (16 direct, 193 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 25 of 26
==19820== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==19820== by 0x4A13AF: virAllocN (memory.c:129)
==19820== by 0x4D4A0E: virDomainDefParseXML (domain_conf.c:7258)
==19820== by 0x4D4C93: virDomainDefParseNode (domain_conf.c:7512)
==19820== by 0x4D562F: virDomainDefParse (domain_conf.c:7465)
==19820== by 0x415863: testCompareXMLToXMLFiles (qemuxml2xmltest.c:35)
==19820== by 0x415982: testCompareXMLToXMLHelper (qemuxml2xmltest.c:80)
==19820== by 0x416D31: virtTestRun (testutils.c:140)
==19820== by 0x415604: mymain (qemuxml2xmltest.c:192)
==19820== by 0x416437: virtTestMain (testutils.c:689)
==19820== by 0x3CA7A1ECDC: (below main) (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==19820==
==19820== LEAK SUMMARY:
==19820== definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
==19820== indirectly lost: 193 bytes in 5 blocks
==19820== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==19820== still reachable: 1,054 bytes in 21 blocks
* How to reproduce?
% valgrind -v --leak-check=full ./tests/qemuxml2xmltest
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* src/rpc/virnettlscontext.c: fix memory leak on
virNetTLSContextValidCertificate.
* Detected in valgrind run:
==25667==
==25667== 6,085 (44 direct, 6,041 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 326 of 351
==25667== at 0x4005447: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==25667== by 0x4F2791F3: _asn1_add_node_only (structure.c:53)
==25667== by 0x4F27997A: _asn1_copy_structure3 (structure.c:421)
==25667== by 0x4F276A50: _asn1_append_sequence_set (element.c:144)
==25667== by 0x4F2743FF: asn1_der_decoding (decoding.c:1194)
==25667== by 0x4F22B9CC: gnutls_x509_crt_import (x509.c:229)
==25667== by 0x805274B: virNetTLSContextCheckCertificate
(virnettlscontext.c:1009)
==25667== by 0x804DE32: testTLSSessionInit (virnettlscontexttest.c:693)
==25667== by 0x804F14D: virtTestRun (testutils.c:140)
==25667==
==25667== 23,188 (88 direct, 23,100 indirect) bytes in 11 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 346 of 351
==25667== at 0x4005447: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==25667== by 0x4F22B841: gnutls_x509_crt_init (x509.c:50)
==25667== by 0x805272B: virNetTLSContextCheckCertificate
(virnettlscontext.c:1003)
==25667== by 0x804DDD1: testTLSSessionInit (virnettlscontexttest.c:673)
==25667== by 0x804F14D: virtTestRun (testutils.c:140)
* How to reproduce?
% cd libvirt && ./configure && make && make -C tests valgrind
or
% valgrind -v --leak-check=full ./tests/virnettlscontexttest
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* tests/virnettlscontexttest: fix memory leak on virnettlscontext test case.
* Detected in valgrind run:
==25667==
==25667== 86,651 (34,680 direct, 51,971 indirect) bytes in 10 blocks are
definitely lost in loss record 350 of 351
==25667== at 0x4005447: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==25667== by 0x4F1F515D: gnutls_init (gnutls_state.c:270)
==25667== by 0x8053432: virNetTLSSessionNew (virnettlscontext.c:1181)
==25667== by 0x804DD24: testTLSSessionInit (virnettlscontexttest.c:624)
==25667== by 0x804F14D: virtTestRun (testutils.c:140)
==25667==
==25667== 100,578 (38,148 direct, 62,430 indirect) bytes in 11 blocks are
definitely lost in loss record 351 of 351
==25667== at 0x4005447: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==25667== by 0x4F1F515D: gnutls_init (gnutls_state.c:270)
==25667== by 0x8053432: virNetTLSSessionNew (virnettlscontext.c:1181)
==25667== by 0x804DD3C: testTLSSessionInit (virnettlscontexttest.c:625)
==25667== by 0x804F14D: virtTestRun (testutils.c:140)
* How to reproduce?
% cd libvirt && ./configure && make && make -C tests valgrind
or
% valgrind -v --leak-check=full ./tests/virnettlscontexttest
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
Variable 'l_disk' initialized to a null pointer value, control jumps to 'case
VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_DEVICE_DISK and then taking false branch, Within the expansion
of the macro 'libxlError': Field access results in a dereference of a null
pointer (loaded from variable 'l_disk').
* src/libxl/libxl_driver.c: Field access results in a dereference of a null
pointer (loaded from variable 'l_disk')
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* tools/virsh.c: fix memory leak on cmdVolCreateAs function.
* Detected in valgrind run:
==4746==
==4746== 48 (40 direct, 8 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 26 of 52
==4746== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==4746== by 0x4C76E51: virAlloc (memory.c:101)
==4746== by 0x4CD9418: virGetStoragePool (datatypes.c:592)
==4746== by 0x4D21367: remoteStoragePoolLookupByName (remote_driver.c:4126)
==4746== by 0x4CE42B0: virStoragePoolLookupByName (libvirt.c:10232)
==4746== by 0x40C276: vshCommandOptPoolBy (virsh.c:13660)
==4746== by 0x40CA37: cmdVolCreateAs (virsh.c:8094)
==4746== by 0x412AF2: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:13770)
==4746== by 0x422F11: main (virsh.c:15127)
==4746==
==4746== 1,011 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 45 of 52
==4746== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==4746== by 0x4A06167: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:525)
==4746== by 0x4C76ECB: virReallocN (memory.c:161)
==4746== by 0x4C60319: virBufferGrow (buf.c:72)
==4746== by 0x4C606AA: virBufferAdd (buf.c:106)
==4746== by 0x40CB37: cmdVolCreateAs (virsh.c:8118)
==4746== by 0x412AF2: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:13770)
==4746== by 0x422F11: main (virsh.c:15127)
==4746==
==4746== LEAK SUMMARY:
==4746== definitely lost: 1,051 bytes in 2 blocks
==4746== indirectly lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
==4746== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==4746== still reachable: 390,767 bytes in 1,373 blocks
==4746== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
* How to reproduce?
% valgrind -v --leak-check=full virsh vol-create-as default foo.img 10M \
--allocation 0 --format qcow2 --backing-vol bar.img
Notes: bar.img doesn't exist.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* src/qemu/qemu_migration.c: avoid dead 'ret' assignment and silence
clang warning.
Detected by ccc-analyzer:
libvirt.c:4277:5: warning: Value stored to 'ret' is never read
ret = domain->conn->driver->domainMigrateConfirm3
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* src/qemu/qemu_migration.c: avoid dead 'ret' assignment and silence
clang warning.
Detected by ccc-analyzer:
CC libvirt_driver_qemu_la-qemu_migration.lo
qemu/qemu_migration.c:2046:5: warning: Value stored to 'ret' is never read
ret = qemuMigrationConfirm(driver, sconn, vm,
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Value stored to 'ret' is never read, so remove this dead assignment.
* src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.c: kill dead assignment.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
Value stored to 'ret' is never read, in fact, 'cleanup' section will
directly return -1 when function is fail, so remove this dead assignment.
* src/qemu/qemu_process.c: kill dead assignment.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
whether or not previous return value is -1, the following codes will be
executed for a inactive guest in src/qemu/qemu_driver.c:
ret = virDomainSaveConfig(driver->configDir, persistentDef);
and if everything is okay, 'ret' is assigned to 0, the previous 'ret'
will be overwritten, this patch will fix this issue.
* src/qemu/qemu_driver.c: avoid return value is overwritten when give a argument
in out of blkio weight range for a inactive guest.
* how to reproduce?
% virsh blkiotune ${guestname} --weight 10
% echo $?
Note: guest must be inactive, argument 10 in out of blkio weight range,
and can get a error information by checking libvirtd.log, however,
virsh hasn't raised any error information, and return value is 0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726304
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
whether or not previous return value is -1, the following codes will be
executed for a inactive guest in qemuDomainSetMemoryParameters:
ret = virDomainSaveConfig(driver->configDir, persistentDef);
and if everything is okay, 'ret' is assigned to 0, the previous 'ret'
will be overwritten, this patch will fix this issue.
* src/qemu/qemu_driver.c: avoid return value is overwritten when set
min_guarante value to a inactive guest.
* how to reproduce?
% virsh memtune ${guestname} --min_guarante 1024
% echo $?
Note: guest must be inactive, in fact, 'min_guarante' hasn't been implemented
in memory tunable, and I can get the error when check actual libvirtd.log,
however, virsh hasn't raised any error information, and return value is 0.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* tools/virsh.c: fix missing zero value judgement in cmdBlkiotune and correct
vshError information.
when weight is equal to 0, the cmdBlkiotune will not raise any error information
when judge weight value first time, and execute else branch to judge weight
value again, strncpy(temp->field, VIR_DOMAIN_BLKIO_WEIGHT, sizeof(temp->field))
will be not executed for ever. However, if and only if param->field is equal
to VIR_DOMAIN_BLKIO_WEIGHT, underlying qemuDomainSetBlkioParameters function
will check whether weight value is in range [100, 1000].
* how to reproduce?
% virsh blkiotune ${guestname} --weight 0
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* tools/virsh.c: avoid memory leak in cmdVolPath.
* src/libvirt.c: Add doc for virStorageVolGetPath to tell one
must free() the returned path after use.
* how to reproduce?
% dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/lib/libvirt/images/foo.img count=1 bs=10M
% virsh pool-refresh default
% valgrind -v --leak-check=full virsh vol-path --vol \
/var/lib/libvirt/images/foo.img
* actual results:
Detected in valgrind run:
==16436== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7 of 22
==16436== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==16436== by 0x386A314B3D: xdr_string (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==16436== by 0x3DF8CD770D: xdr_remote_nonnull_string (remote_protocol.c:3
==16436== by 0x3DF8CD7EC8: xdr_remote_storage_vol_get_path_ret
% virsh pool-refresh default
% valgrind -v --leak-check=full virsh vol-path --vol \
/var/lib/libvirt/images/foo.img
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
* tools/virsh.c: avoid double free of domain, when weight value of blkiotune
less than 0, codes will free domain and jump to cleanup section, however,
cleanup will free domain again.
Detected in valgrind run:
==21297== ERROR SUMMARY: 20 errors from 20 contexts (suppressed: 69 from 8)
==21297==
==21297== 1 errors in context 1 of 20:
==21297== Invalid read of size 4
==21297== at 0x40E209B: virDomainFree (libvirt.c:2096)
==21297== by 0x8065274: cmdBlkiotune (virsh.c:3695)
==21297== by 0x8054CC1: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:13135)
==21297== by 0x806B967: main (virsh.c:14487)
==21297== Address 0x446ad48 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 36 free'd
==21297== at 0x4005B0A: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:325)
==21297== by 0x406814D: virFree (memory.c:310)
==21297== by 0x40D6635: virReleaseDomain (datatypes.c:243)
==21297== by 0x40D6C5E: virUnrefDomain (datatypes.c:280)
==21297== by 0x40E20B9: virDomainFree (libvirt.c:2101)
==21297== by 0x8065297: cmdBlkiotune (virsh.c:3613)
==21297== by 0x8054CC1: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:13135)
==21297== by 0x806B967: main (virsh.c:14487)
==21297==
==21297==
==21297== 1 errors in context 2 of 20:
==21297== Invalid read of size 4
==21297== at 0x40E1FE6: virDomainFree (libvirt.c:2092)
==21297== by 0x8065274: cmdBlkiotune (virsh.c:3695)
==21297== by 0x8054CC1: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:13135)
==21297== by 0x806B967: main (virsh.c:14487)
==21297== Address 0x446ad48 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 36 free'd
==21297== at 0x4005B0A: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:325)
==21297== by 0x406814D: virFree (memory.c:310)
==21297== by 0x40D6635: virReleaseDomain (datatypes.c:243)
==21297== by 0x40D6C5E: virUnrefDomain (datatypes.c:280)
==21297== by 0x40E20B9: virDomainFree (libvirt.c:2101)
==21297== by 0x8065297: cmdBlkiotune (virsh.c:3613)
==21297== by 0x8054CC1: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:13135)
==21297== by 0x806B967: main (virsh.c:14487)
* how to reproduce?
% valgrind -v --leak-check=full virsh blkiotune guestname --weight -1
Detected in valgrind run:
==9184== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 19
==9184== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==9184== by 0x3073715F78: xdr_array (xdr_array.c:97)
==9184== by 0x4CF97C9: xdr_remote_domain_get_security_label_ret (remote_protocol.c:1696)
==9184== by 0x4D08741: virNetMessageDecodePayload (virnetmessage.c:286)
==9184== by 0x4D00F78: virNetClientProgramCall (virnetclientprogram.c:318)
==9184== by 0x4CE3887: call (remote_driver.c:3933)
==9184== by 0x4CF71C6: remoteDomainGetSecurityLabel (remote_driver.c:1580)
==9184== by 0x4CCA480: virDomainGetSecurityLabel (libvirt.c:7340)
==9184== by 0x41993A: cmdDominfo (virsh.c:2414)
==9184== by 0x411E92: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12730)
==9184== by 0x4211ED: main (virsh.c:14076)
==9184==
==9184== 2 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 19
==9184== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==9184== by 0x3073715F78: xdr_array (xdr_array.c:97)
==9184== by 0x4CF974F: xdr_remote_node_get_security_model_ret (remote_protocol.c:1713)
==9184== by 0x4D08741: virNetMessageDecodePayload (virnetmessage.c:286)
==9184== by 0x4D00F78: virNetClientProgramCall (virnetclientprogram.c:318)
==9184== by 0x4CE3887: call (remote_driver.c:3933)
==9184== by 0x4CF6F96: remoteNodeGetSecurityModel (remote_driver.c:1648)
==9184== by 0x4CBF799: virNodeGetSecurityModel (libvirt.c:7382)
==9184== by 0x4197D7: cmdDominfo (virsh.c:2394)
==9184== by 0x411E92: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12730)
==9184== by 0x4211ED: main (virsh.c:14076)
==9184==
==9184== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3 of 19
==9184== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==9184== by 0x3073715F78: xdr_array (xdr_array.c:97)
==9184== by 0x4CF9729: xdr_remote_node_get_security_model_ret (remote_protocol.c:1710)
==9184== by 0x4D08741: virNetMessageDecodePayload (virnetmessage.c:286)
==9184== by 0x4D00F78: virNetClientProgramCall (virnetclientprogram.c:318)
==9184== by 0x4CE3887: call (remote_driver.c:3933)
==9184== by 0x4CF6F96: remoteNodeGetSecurityModel (remote_driver.c:1648)
==9184== by 0x4CBF799: virNodeGetSecurityModel (libvirt.c:7382)
==9184== by 0x4197D7: cmdDominfo (virsh.c:2394)
==9184== by 0x411E92: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12730)
==9184== by 0x4211ED: main (virsh.c:14076)
==9184==
==9184== LEAK SUMMARY:
==9184== definitely lost: 11 bytes in 3 blocks
* src/remote/remote_driver.c: Avoid leak on remoteDomainGetSecurityLabel
and remoteNodeGetSecurityModel.
Alex Jia