OilfieldToolsNet/opm-common
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Support defining new UDQ keywords inside ACTIONX block

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Joakim Hove
2020-09-16 16:06:02 +02:00
parent d60a91c3dd
commit aefa3cd9d2
5 changed files with 692 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Schedule/Schedule.hpp
View File

@@ -401,9 +401,9 @@ namespace Opm
void addGroupToGroup( const std::string& parent_group, const Group& child_group, size_t timeStep);
void addGroup(const std::string& groupName , size_t timeStep, const UnitSystem& unit_system);
void addWell(const std::string& wellName, const DeckRecord& record, size_t timeStep, Connection::Order connection_order, const UnitSystem& unit_system);
void checkUnhandledKeywords( const SCHEDULESection& ) const;
void checkIfAllConnectionsIsShut(size_t currentStep);
void updateUDQ(const DeckKeyword& keyword, std::size_t current_step);
void handleKeyword(std::shared_ptr<const Python> python,
const std::string& input_path,
size_t currentStep,
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ namespace Opm
}
}
void applyEXIT(const DeckKeyword&, std::size_t currentStep);
void handleEXIT(const DeckKeyword&, std::size_t currentStep);
void applyMESSAGES(const DeckKeyword&, std::size_t currentStep);
void applyWELOPEN(const DeckKeyword&, std::size_t currentStep, const ParseContext&, ErrorGuard&, const std::vector<std::string>& matching_wells = {});
void applyWRFT(const DeckKeyword&, std::size_t currentStep);

4
src/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Schedule/Action/ActionX.cpp
View File

@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ namespace Action {
bool ActionX::valid_keyword(const std::string& keyword) {
static std::unordered_set<std::string> actionx_whitelist = {"EXIT", "WELSPECS","WELOPEN"};
return (actionx_whitelist.find(keyword) != actionx_whitelist.end());
static std::unordered_set<std::string> actionx_allowed_list = {"EXIT", "WELSPECS","WELOPEN", "UDQ"};
return (actionx_allowed_list.find(keyword) != actionx_allowed_list.end());
}

27
src/opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Schedule/Schedule.cpp
View File

@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ Schedule::Schedule(const Deck& deck, const EclipseState& es, const ParseContext&
this->m_nupcol.update(handlerContext.currentStep, nupcol);
}
void Schedule::applyEXIT(const DeckKeyword& keyword, std::size_t report_step) {
void Schedule::handleEXIT(const DeckKeyword& keyword, std::size_t report_step) {
using ex = ParserKeywords::EXIT;
int status = keyword.getRecord(0).getItem<ex::STATUS_CODE>().get<int>(0);
OpmLog::info("Simulation exit with status: " + std::to_string(status) + " requested as part of ACTIONX at report_step: " + std::to_string(report_step));
@@ -1167,6 +1167,25 @@ Schedule::Schedule(const Deck& deck, const EclipseState& es, const ParseContext&
this->udq_config.update(handlerContext.currentStep, new_udq);
}
/*
This routine is called when UDQ keywords is added in an ACTIONX block.
*/
void Schedule::updateUDQ(const DeckKeyword& keyword, std::size_t current_step) {
const auto& current = *this->udq_config.get(current_step);
std::shared_ptr<UDQConfig> new_udq = std::make_shared<UDQConfig>(current);
for (const auto& record : keyword)
new_udq->add_record(record, current_step);
auto next_index = this->udq_config.update_equal(current_step, new_udq);
if (next_index) {
for (const auto& [report_step, udq_ptr] : this->udq_config.unique() ) {
if (report_step > current_step) {
for (const auto& record : keyword)
udq_ptr->add_record(record, current_step);
}
}
}
}
void Schedule::handleWTEST(const HandlerContext& handlerContext, const ParseContext& parseContext, ErrorGuard& errors) {
const auto& current = *this->wtest_config.get(handlerContext.currentStep);
@@ -2786,9 +2805,11 @@ Schedule::Schedule(const Deck& deck, const EclipseState& es, const ParseContext&
this->applyWELOPEN(keyword, reportStep, parseContext, errors, result.wells());
if (keyword.name() == "EXIT")
this->applyEXIT(keyword, reportStep);
}
this->handleEXIT(keyword, reportStep);
if (keyword.name() == "UDQ")
this->updateUDQ(keyword, reportStep);
}
}
RestartConfig& Schedule::restart() {

46
tests/msim/test_msim_ACTIONX.cpp
View File

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Schedule/Action/ActionContext.hpp>
#include <opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Schedule/Action/Actions.hpp>
#include <opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Schedule/Action/ActionX.hpp>
#include <opm/parser/eclipse/EclipseState/Schedule/UDQ/UDQConfig.hpp>
#include <opm/parser/eclipse/Deck/Deck.hpp>
#include <opm/parser/eclipse/Parser/Parser.hpp>
#include <opm/parser/eclipse/Parser/ParseContext.hpp>
@@ -338,6 +339,51 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(UDQ_WUWCT) {
}
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(UDQ_IN_ACTIONX) {
#include "udq_in_actionx.include"
test_data td( actionx1 );
msim sim(td.state);
{
WorkArea work_area("test_msim");
EclipseIO io(td.state, td.state.getInputGrid(), td.schedule, td.summary_config);
sim.well_rate("P1", data::Rates::opt::oil, prod_opr);
sim.well_rate("P2", data::Rates::opt::oil, prod_opr);
sim.well_rate("P3", data::Rates::opt::oil, prod_opr);
sim.well_rate("P4", data::Rates::opt::oil, prod_opr);
sim.well_rate("P1", data::Rates::opt::wat, prod_wpr_P1);
sim.well_rate("P2", data::Rates::opt::wat, prod_wpr_P2);
sim.well_rate("P3", data::Rates::opt::wat, prod_wpr_P3);
sim.well_rate("P4", data::Rates::opt::wat, prod_wpr_P4);
{
const auto& w1 = td.schedule.getWell("P1", 15);
BOOST_CHECK(w1.getStatus() == Well::Status::OPEN );
const auto& udq1 = td.schedule.getUDQConfig(15);
BOOST_CHECK(!udq1.has_keyword("FUNEW"));
const auto& udq2 = td.schedule.getUDQConfig(25);
BOOST_CHECK(udq2.has_keyword("FUPROD"));
}
sim.run(td.schedule, io, false);
{
const auto& w1 = td.schedule.getWell("P1", 15);
BOOST_CHECK(w1.getStatus() == Well::Status::OPEN );
const auto& udq1 = td.schedule.getUDQConfig(15);
BOOST_CHECK(udq1.has_keyword("FUNEW"));
const auto& udq2 = td.schedule.getUDQConfig(25);
BOOST_CHECK(udq2.has_keyword("FUPROD"));
BOOST_CHECK(udq2.has_keyword("FUNEW"));
}
}
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(UDA) {
#include "uda.include"

618
tests/msim/udq_in_actionx.include Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,618 @@
std::string actionx1 = R"(
-- This reservoir simulation deck is made available under the Open Database
-- License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/. Any rights in
-- individual contents of the database are licensed under the Database Contents
-- License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/
-- Copyright (C) 2015 Statoil
-- This simulation is based on the data given in
-- 'Comparison of Solutions to a Three-Dimensional
-- Black-Oil Reservoir Simulation Problem' by Aziz S. Odeh,
-- Journal of Petroleum Technology, January 1981
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------ SPE1 - CASE 1 ------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
RUNSPEC
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE
SPE1 - CASE 1
DIMENS
10 10 3 /
-- The number of equilibration regions is inferred from the EQLDIMS
-- keyword.
EQLDIMS
/
-- The number of PVTW tables is inferred from the TABDIMS keyword;
-- when no data is included in the keyword the default values are used.
TABDIMS
/
OIL
GAS
WATER
DISGAS
-- As seen from figure 4 in Odeh, GOR is increasing with time,
-- which means that dissolved gas is present
FIELD
START
1 'DEC' 2014 /
WELLDIMS
-- Item 1: maximum number of wells in the model
-- - there are two wells in the problem; injector and producer
-- Item 2: maximum number of grid blocks connected to any one well
-- - must be one as the wells are located at specific grid blocks
-- Item 3: maximum number of groups in the model
-- - we are dealing with only one 'group'
-- Item 4: maximum number of wells in any one group
-- - there must be two wells in a group as there are two wells in total
5 1 1 2 /
UNIFOUT
UDQDIMS
50 25 0 50 50 0 0 50 0 20 /
GRID
-- The INIT keyword is used to request an .INIT file. The .INIT file
-- is written before the simulation actually starts, and contains grid
-- properties and saturation tables as inferred from the input
-- deck. There are no other keywords which can be used to configure
-- exactly what is written to the .INIT file.
INIT
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOECHO
DX
-- There are in total 300 cells with length 1000ft in x-direction
300*1000 /
DY
-- There are in total 300 cells with length 1000ft in y-direction
300*1000 /
DZ
-- The layers are 20, 30 and 50 ft thick, in each layer there are 100 cells
100*20 100*30 100*50 /
TOPS
-- The depth of the top of each grid block
100*8325 /
PORO
-- Constant porosity of 0.3 throughout all 300 grid cells
300*0.3 /
PERMX
-- The layers have perm. 500mD, 50mD and 200mD, respectively.
100*500 100*50 100*200 /
PERMY
-- Equal to PERMX
100*500 100*50 100*200 /
PERMZ
-- Cannot find perm. in z-direction in Odeh's paper
-- For the time being, we will assume PERMZ equal to PERMX and PERMY:
100*500 100*50 100*200 /
ECHO
PROPS
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
PVTW
-- Item 1: pressure reference (psia)
-- Item 2: water FVF (rb per bbl or rb per stb)
-- Item 3: water compressibility (psi^{-1})
-- Item 4: water viscosity (cp)
-- Item 5: water 'viscosibility' (psi^{-1})
-- Using values from Norne:
-- In METRIC units:
-- 277.0 1.038 4.67E-5 0.318 0.0 /
-- In FIELD units:
4017.55 1.038 3.22E-6 0.318 0.0 /
ROCK
-- Item 1: reference pressure (psia)
-- Item 2: rock compressibility (psi^{-1})
-- Using values from table 1 in Odeh:
14.7 3E-6 /
SWOF
-- Column 1: water saturation
-- - this has been set to (almost) equally spaced values from 0.12 to 1
-- Column 2: water relative permeability
-- - generated from the Corey-type approx. formula
-- the coeffisient is set to 10e-5, S_{orw}=0 and S_{wi}=0.12
-- Column 3: oil relative permeability when only oil and water are present
-- - we will use the same values as in column 3 in SGOF.
-- This is not really correct, but since only the first
-- two values are of importance, this does not really matter
-- Column 4: water-oil capillary pressure (psi)
0.12 0 1 0
0.18 4.64876033057851E-008 1 0
0.24 0.000000186 0.997 0
0.3 4.18388429752066E-007 0.98 0
0.36 7.43801652892562E-007 0.7 0
0.42 1.16219008264463E-006 0.35 0
0.48 1.67355371900826E-006 0.2 0
0.54 2.27789256198347E-006 0.09 0
0.6 2.97520661157025E-006 0.021 0
0.66 3.7654958677686E-006 0.01 0
0.72 4.64876033057851E-006 0.001 0
0.78 0.000005625 0.0001 0
0.84 6.69421487603306E-006 0 0
0.91 8.05914256198347E-006 0 0
1 0.00001 0 0 /
SGOF
-- Column 1: gas saturation
-- Column 2: gas relative permeability
-- Column 3: oil relative permeability when oil, gas and connate water are present
-- Column 4: oil-gas capillary pressure (psi)
-- - stated to be zero in Odeh's paper
-- Values in column 1-3 are taken from table 3 in Odeh's paper:
0 0 1 0
0.001 0 1 0
0.02 0 0.997 0
0.05 0.005 0.980 0
0.12 0.025 0.700 0
0.2 0.075 0.350 0
0.25 0.125 0.200 0
0.3 0.190 0.090 0
0.4 0.410 0.021 0
0.45 0.60 0.010 0
0.5 0.72 0.001 0
0.6 0.87 0.0001 0
0.7 0.94 0.000 0
0.85 0.98 0.000 0
0.88 0.984 0.000 0 /
--1.00 1.0 0.000 0 /
-- Warning from Eclipse: first sat. value in SWOF + last sat. value in SGOF
-- must not be greater than 1, but Eclipse still runs
-- Flow needs the sum to be excactly 1 so I added a row with gas sat. = 0.88
-- The corresponding krg value was estimated by assuming linear rel. between
-- gas sat. and krw. between gas sat. 0.85 and 1.00 (the last two values given)
DENSITY
-- Density (lb per ft³) at surface cond. of
-- oil, water and gas, respectively (in that order)
-- Using values from Norne:
-- In METRIC units:
-- 859.5 1033.0 0.854 /
-- In FIELD units:
53.66 64.49 0.0533 /
PVDG
-- Column 1: gas phase pressure (psia)
-- Column 2: gas formation volume factor (rb per Mscf)
-- - in Odeh's paper the units are said to be given in rb per bbl,
-- but this is assumed to be a mistake: FVF-values in Odeh's paper
-- are given in rb per scf, not rb per bbl. This will be in
-- agreement with conventions
-- Column 3: gas viscosity (cP)
-- Using values from lower right table in Odeh's table 2:
14.700 166.666 0.008000
264.70 12.0930 0.009600
514.70 6.27400 0.011200
1014.7 3.19700 0.014000
2014.7 1.61400 0.018900
2514.7 1.29400 0.020800
3014.7 1.08000 0.022800
4014.7 0.81100 0.026800
5014.7 0.64900 0.030900
9014.7 0.38600 0.047000 /
PVTO
-- Column 1: dissolved gas-oil ratio (Mscf per stb)
-- Column 2: bubble point pressure (psia)
-- Column 3: oil FVF for saturated oil (rb per stb)
-- Column 4: oil viscosity for saturated oil (cP)
-- Use values from top left table in Odeh's table 2:
0.0010 14.7 1.0620 1.0400 /
0.0905 264.7 1.1500 0.9750 /
0.1800 514.7 1.2070 0.9100 /
0.3710 1014.7 1.2950 0.8300 /
0.6360 2014.7 1.4350 0.6950 /
0.7750 2514.7 1.5000 0.6410 /
0.9300 3014.7 1.5650 0.5940 /
1.2700 4014.7 1.6950 0.5100
9014.7 1.5790 0.7400 /
1.6180 5014.7 1.8270 0.4490
9014.7 1.7370 0.6310 /
-- It is required to enter data for undersaturated oil for the highest GOR
-- (i.e. the last row) in the PVTO table.
-- In order to fulfill this requirement, values for oil FVF and viscosity
-- at 9014.7psia and GOR=1.618 for undersaturated oil have been approximated:
-- It has been assumed that there is a linear relation between the GOR
-- and the FVF when keeping the pressure constant at 9014.7psia.
-- From Odeh we know that (at 9014.7psia) the FVF is 2.357 at GOR=2.984
-- for saturated oil and that the FVF is 1.579 at GOR=1.27 for undersaturated oil,
-- so it is possible to use the assumption described above.
-- An equivalent approximation for the viscosity has been used.
/
SOLUTION
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
EQUIL
-- Item 1: datum depth (ft)
-- Item 2: pressure at datum depth (psia)
-- - Odeh's table 1 says that initial reservoir pressure is
-- 4800 psi at 8400ft, which explains choice of item 1 and 2
-- Item 3: depth of water-oil contact (ft)
-- - chosen to be directly under the reservoir
-- Item 4: oil-water capillary pressure at the water oil contact (psi)
-- - given to be 0 in Odeh's paper
-- Item 5: depth of gas-oil contact (ft)
-- - chosen to be directly above the reservoir
-- Item 6: gas-oil capillary pressure at gas-oil contact (psi)
-- - given to be 0 in Odeh's paper
-- Item 7: RSVD-table
-- Item 8: RVVD-table
-- Item 9: Set to 0 as this is the only value supported by OPM
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
8400 4800 8450 0 8300 0 1 0 0 /
RSVD
-- Dissolved GOR is initially constant with depth through the reservoir.
-- The reason is that the initial reservoir pressure given is higher
---than the bubble point presssure of 4014.7psia, meaning that there is no
-- free gas initially present.
8300 1.270
8450 1.270 /
SUMMARY
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOPR
WGOR
/
WOPR
/
WWPR
/
WWCT
/
FGOR
-- 2a) Pressures of the cell where the injector and producer are located
BPR
1 1 1 /
10 10 3 /
/
-- 2b) Gas saturation at grid points given in Odeh's paper
BGSAT
1 1 1 /
1 1 2 /
1 1 3 /
10 1 1 /
10 1 2 /
10 1 3 /
10 10 1 /
10 10 2 /
10 10 3 /
/
-- In order to compare Eclipse with Flow:
WBHP
/
WGIR
'INJ'
/
WGIT
'INJ'
/
WGPR
/
WGPT
/
WOPR
/
WOPT
/
WWIR
/
WWIT
/
WWPR
/
WWPT
/
WUBHP
/
WUOPRL
/
WUWCT
/
FOPR
FUOPR
SCHEDULE
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
RPTSCHED
'PRES' 'SGAS' 'RS' 'WELLS' 'WELSPECS' /
RPTRST
'BASIC=1' /
UDQ
ASSIGN WUBHP 11 /
ASSIGN WUOPRL 20 /
ASSIGN WUBHP P2 12 /
ASSIGN WUBHP P3 13 /
ASSIGN WUBHP P4 14 /
UNITS WUBHP 'BARSA' /
UNITS WUOPRL 'SM3/DAY' /
DEFINE WUWCT WWPR / (WWPR + WOPR) /
UNITS WUWCT '1' /
DEFINE FUOPR SUM(WOPR) /
UNITS FUOPR 'SM3/DAY' /
/
-- If no resolution (i.e. case 1), the two following lines must be added:
DRSDT
0 /
-- if DRSDT is set to 0, GOR cannot rise and free gas does not
-- dissolve in undersaturated oil -> constant bubble point pressure
WELSPECS
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6
'P1' 'G1' 3 3 8400 'OIL' /
'P2' 'G1' 4 4 8400 'OIL' /
'P3' 'G1' 5 5 8400 'OIL' /
'P4' 'G1' 6 6 8400 'OIL' /
'INJ' 'G1' 1 1 8335 'GAS' /
/
-- Coordinates in item 3-4 are retrieved from Odeh's figure 1 and 2
-- Note that the depth at the midpoint of the well grid blocks
-- has been used as reference depth for bottom hole pressure in item 5
COMPDAT
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
'P1' 3 3 3 3 'OPEN' 1* 1* 0.5 /
'P2' 4 4 3 3 'OPEN' 1* 1* 0.5 /
'P3' 5 5 3 3 'OPEN' 1* 1* 0.5 /
'P4' 6 6 3 3 'OPEN' 1* 1* 0.5 /
'INJ' 1 1 1 1 'OPEN' 1* 1* 0.5 /
/
-- Coordinates in item 2-5 are retreived from Odeh's figure 1 and 2
-- Item 9 is the well bore internal diameter,
-- the radius is given to be 0.25ft in Odeh's paper
UDQ
DEFINE FUINJ 0.90 * SUM(WWPR 'P*') /
UNITS FUINJ 'SM3/DAY' /
/
ACTIONX
'SHUT_WELL' 100000 /
WWCT * > 0.50 /
/
UDQ
DEFINE FUNEW 0.90 * SUM(WWPR 'P*') /
UNITS FUNEW 'SM3/DAY' /
/
WELOPEN
'?' 'SHUT' 0 0 0 2* /
/
ENDACTIO
WCONPROD
-- Item #:1 2 3 4 5 9
'P1' 'OPEN' 'ORAT' 5000 4* 1000 /
'P2' 'OPEN' 'ORAT' 5000 4* 1000 /
'P3' 'OPEN' 'ORAT' 5000 4* 1000 /
'P4' 'OPEN' 'ORAT' 5000 4* 1000 /
/
-- It is stated in Odeh's paper that the maximum oil prod. rate
-- is 20 000stb per day which explains the choice of value in item 4.
-- The items > 4 are defaulted with the exception of item 9,
-- the BHP lower limit, which is given to be 1000psia in Odeh's paper
WCONINJE
-- Item #:1 2 3 4 5 6 7
'INJ' 'GAS' 'OPEN' 'RATE' 100000 1* 9014 /
/
-- Stated in Odeh that gas inj. rate (item 5) is 100MMscf per day
-- BHP upper limit (item 7) should not be exceeding the highest
-- pressure in the PVT table=9014.7psia (default is 100 000psia)
DATES -- 1
1 'JAN' 2015 /
/
DATES -- 2
1 'FEB' 2015 /
/
DATES -- 3
1 'MAR' 2015 /
/
DATES -- 4
1 'APR' 2015 /
/
DATES -- 5
1 'MAI' 2015 /
/
DATES
1 'JUN' 2015 /
/
DATES
1 'JUL' 2015 /
/
DATES
1 'AUG' 2015 /
/
DATES
1 'SEP' 2015 /
/
DATES -- 10
1 'OCT' 2015 /
/
DATES
1 'NOV' 2015 /
/
DATES
1 'DEC' 2015 /
/
DATES
1 'JAN' 2016 /
/
DATES
1 'FEB' 2016 /
/
DATES -- 15
1 'MAR' 2016 /
/
DATES
1 'APR' 2016 /
/
DATES
1 'MAI' 2016 /
/
DATES
1 'JUN' 2016 /
/
DATES
1 'JUL' 2016 /
/
DATES -- 20
1 'AUG' 2016 /
/
DATES
1 'SEP' 2016 /
/
DATES
1 'OCT' 2016 /
/
DATES
1 'NOV' 2016 /
/
DATES -- 24
1 'DEC' 2016 /
/
UDQ
DEFINE FUPROD 0.90 * SUM(WWPR 'P*') /
UNITS FUPROD 'SM3/DAY' /
/
DATES -- 25
1 'JAN' 2017 /
/
DATES
1 'FEB' 2017 /
/
DATES
1 'MAR' 2017 /
/
DATES
1 'APR' 2017 /
/
DATES
1 'MAI' 2017 /
/
DATES -- 30
1 'JUN' 2017 /
/
DATES
1 'JUL' 2017 /
/
DATES
1 'AUG' 2017 /
/
DATES
1 'SEP' 2017 /
/
DATES
1 'OCT' 2017 /
/
DATES -- 35
1 'NOV' 2017 /
/
DATES -- 36
1 'DEC' 2017 /
/
END
)";