mirror of
https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators.git
synced 2025-02-25 18:55:30 -06:00
Use More Specific Name for 'anyFailedChecks'
The function returns whether or not there were any failed checks at the 'Standard' level. Make the function name reflect this.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8082e72d32
commit
b5305b928d
@ -104,11 +104,11 @@ SatfuncConsistencyCheckManager(const std::size_t numSamplePoints,
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename Scalar>
|
||||
bool Opm::Satfunc::PhaseChecks::SatfuncConsistencyCheckManager<Scalar>::
|
||||
anyFailedChecks() const
|
||||
anyFailedStandardChecks() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return std::any_of(this->curves_.begin(), this->curves_.end(),
|
||||
[](const auto& curve)
|
||||
{ return curve.checks.anyFailedChecks(); });
|
||||
{ return curve.checks.anyFailedStandardChecks(); });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename Scalar>
|
||||
|
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ namespace Opm::Satfunc::PhaseChecks {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether or not any checks failed at the \c Standard level.
|
||||
bool anyFailedChecks() const;
|
||||
bool anyFailedStandardChecks() const;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether or not any checks failed at the \c Critical level.
|
||||
bool anyFailedCriticalChecks() const;
|
||||
|
@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ collectFailures(const int root,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename Scalar>
|
||||
bool Opm::SatfuncConsistencyChecks<Scalar>::anyFailedChecks() const
|
||||
bool Opm::SatfuncConsistencyChecks<Scalar>::anyFailedStandardChecks() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return this->anyFailedChecks(ViolationLevel::Standard);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ namespace Opm {
|
||||
void collectFailures(int root, const Parallel::Communication& comm);
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether or not any checks failed at the \c Standard level.
|
||||
bool anyFailedChecks() const;
|
||||
bool anyFailedStandardChecks() const;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether or not any checks failed at the \c Critical level.
|
||||
bool anyFailedCriticalChecks() const;
|
||||
|
@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ SWL
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ SWL
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ SWU
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ SWU
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ SWCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ SWCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ SGL
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ SGL
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ SGU
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ SGU
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ SGCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ SGCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ SWL
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ SGCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ SOWCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ SOWCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ SOGCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ SOGCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ SOWCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ SOWCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ SOGCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ SOGCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ SOWCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ SOGCR
|
||||
checkMgr.collectFailuresTo(root)
|
||||
.run(grid.leafGridView(), [](const auto&) { return 0; });
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checkMgr.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must not be any failed checks at the standard level");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checkMgr.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be failed checks at the critical level");
|
||||
|
@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(All_Good)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(1234, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be no failed checks");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Violation)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(1234, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
auto rpt = std::string{};
|
||||
@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Violation_ReportIJK)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(1234, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
auto rpt = std::string{};
|
||||
@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Critical_Violation)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(42, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be no failed standard level checks");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(1234, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
auto rpt = std::string{};
|
||||
@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(1234, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
auto rpt = std::string{};
|
||||
@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Multiple_Failing_Points)
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints( 1618, makePoints());
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(31415, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
auto rpt = std::string{};
|
||||
@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(1234, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
auto rpt = std::string{};
|
||||
@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Multiple_Failing_Points)
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints( 1618, makePoints());
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(31415, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
auto rpt = std::string{};
|
||||
|
@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(All_Good)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be no failed checks");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Violation)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Critical_Violation)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be no failed standard level checks");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Violation)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Critical_Violation)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be no failed standard level checks");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Violation)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Critical_Violation)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be no failed standard level checks");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Multiple_Failing_Points)
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(rankMultiplier*(comm.rank() + 1) + 1618, makePoints());
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(rankMultiplier*(comm.rank() + 1) + 31415, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Multiple_Failing_Points)
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(rankMultiplier*(comm.rank() + 1) + 1618, makePoints());
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(rankMultiplier*(comm.rank() + 1) + 31415, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Multiple_Failing_Points)
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(rankMultiplier*(comm.rank() + 1) + 1618, makePoints());
|
||||
checker.checkEndpoints(rankMultiplier*(comm.rank() + 1) + 31415, makePoints());
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Multiple_Failing_Points)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -1612,7 +1612,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Multiple_Failing_Points)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -1863,7 +1863,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
@ -1977,7 +1977,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Standard_Multiple_Failing_Points)
|
||||
|
||||
checker.collectFailures(0, comm);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedChecks(),
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker.anyFailedStandardChecks(),
|
||||
"There must be at least one failed check");
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(! checker.anyFailedCriticalChecks(),
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user