Specifically, the tests
if (!wells->type[self_index] == INJECTOR)
if (!wells->type[self_index] == PRODUCER)
produced the expected results *only* because INJECTOR==0 and PRODUCER==1
in the WellType enumeration, thus (!INJECTOR == PRODUCER) and
(!PRODUCER == INJECTOR).
Installing the (much) more appropriate
if (wells->type[self_index] != INJECTOR)
if (wells->type[self_index] != PRODUCER)
is not only more readable, it is also future-proof and scales better if
we ever introduce new WellTypes (e.g., a MONITOR).
It complains about not finding a match for the pair<> template class,
because the first parameter (this) is allegedly const. However, this
isn't a const method, so I suspect it is a compiler bug.
In order to move on, I slap on a harmless cast which will make this
particular compiler happy, and which should have no effects elsewhere,
but put it in a #if..#else..#endif macro to avoid warnings on others;
hopefully this also makes it easier to spot and remove in the future.
The class TransportModelTracerTofDiscGal now uses
VelocityInterpolationInterface, and acts as a factory
internally, choosing an interpolation method depending on
the parameter 'use_cvi'.
Order of arguments for computePhaseFlowRatesPerWell() was wrong.
This fix was done previously for SimulatorCompressibleTwophase,
but the incompressible sim was ignored.
Also added an ASSERT that may help catch some misuse.
In the Wells struct, production rate control targets must be negative
(and injection rate control targets are always positive).
In the WellsGroup classes, there are separate variables for injection
and production, and all rates are positive. Therefore, upon adding or
modification of a production rate control, the negated value must
be used.
This installs a measure of safety on the part of the interface in that
the caller is free to dispose of the wells object upon returning from
the WellsManager constructor.
Basis functions, quadratures and velocity interpolation are basic versions,
not handling any higher than DG(1) for now. These are currently in helper
classes and functions. The code in the main solver class is written with
the aim of supporting DG(n) generally.
