Instead of the WellsManager guessing which wells are handled by other
processes we now use tha ouput of the load balancer to compute wells
that are handled by other processes.
With the previous approach it was not possible to calculate this information
correctly. Wells with only one completion next to the border of the
processes' partition were represented on multiple processes. In additition
wells that the eclipse schedule section defined with completions on non-active
cells in sequential runs were not at all calculated in parallel runs.
With the new approach the CpGrid::loaBalance routine returns the set names of
wells that are not handled by this process when setting up the simulation. This
information is then used throughout the simulation.
while the printed number of "Non linear iterations" was correct in a
strict sense, it was very confusing if one was working on the
linearization code because the last Newton iteration of each time step
was linearized but not solved for (and the solution was thus not
updated hence it does not count as a "non linear iteration"). This
makes sense for large problems were the total runtime is completely
dominated by the performance of the linear solver, but smaller
problems exhibit the opposite behavior (i.e., for them, runtime is
typically dominated by the linearization proceedure), so one is more
interested in the number of linearizations, not the number of linear
solves.
models may need a more detailed picture of where they are in the
simulation. Note that since the timer objects are available at every
call site, this is also not a very deep change.
As for each well only one process is responsible, the output process
does not see all wells. Ergo some well switching information was never
printed in a parallel run.
Therefore with this commit the well switching
message is printed regardless on which process it appears.
