This is happening because despite the user already existing in the forum, the `SingleSignOnRecord` doesn't exist and "require_activation" is set on the provider, causing us to skip looking for the email, and resulting in us creating a new User then seeing Validation failed: Primary email has already been taken when DiscourseConnect is attempting to make a new account.
Cater for polls that can have multiple votes per user.
This fixes an older UserMerge and migration which was intended to
de-duplicate poll votes but did not account for "multiple" type polls.
When merging users, polls may error out if the source and target users have both voted on the same poll before. 😢
There is no constraint on the `poll_votes` table either to support this. Ideally a composite primary key can be used `(poll_id, user_id)`, but alas there is no support yet, which is probably why it wasn't created in the first place.
This fix ensures that merging is successful by only keeping the target poll votes if duplicates exist.
This fix also runs a migration on older poll votes where failed merges would have caused a single user to have voted twice on a single poll. e.g. this weird edge case
An older change about optimising images caused the selector that adds lightboxing not to apply on quoted images. This fixes that. The selector is now not applicable as optimisation occurs in a separate place.
This change allows quoted images to be opened in a lightbox.
We currently apply type: :link watched words to custom user fields. This makes the user card pretty ugly because we don't allow html / links there. Additionally, the admin UI also does not say that we apply this to custom user fields, but only words in posts.
So this PR is to remove the replacement of link-type watch words for custom user fields.
A while back the definition of TL was changed but many
areas in the codebase still use the term 'Regular user'
despite it having some implicit meaning (TL2).
See 20140905055251_rename_trust_level_badges.rb
When creating a group membership request, there is no character
limit on the 'reason' field. This can be potentially be used by
an attacker to create enormous amount of data in the database.
Co-authored-by: Ted Johansson <ted@discourse.org>
Only allow maximum of `50_000` characters for chat drafts. A hidden `max_chat_draft_length` setting can control this limit. A migration is also provided to delete any abusive draft in the database.
The number of drafts loaded on current user has also been limited and ordered by most recent update.
Note that spec files moved are not directly related to the fix.
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
Essentially,
Saturday at 2:50 PM -> Saturday at 4:38 PM becomes
Saturday at 2:50 PM -> 4:38 PM (Singapore)
Also, the displayed dates are shortened when the standalone date
is within two days. So despite the 'from' and 'to' date being the
same day, it may show 'Saturday' for 'from', and the specific date
for the 'to'. This corrects the behaviour.
(so if the current date and time is Thursday 5PM, the 'from' date
below is within 2 days, but the 'to' date is not)
Saturday at 2:50 PM -> 8 October 2022 at 9:38 PM becomes
Saturday at 2:50 PM -> 9:38 PM
In an earlier PR, we decided that we only want to block a domain if
the blocked domain in the SiteSetting is the final destination (/t/59305). That
PR used `FinalDestination#get`. `resolve` however is used several places
but blocks domains along the redirect chain when certain options are provided.
This commit changes the default options for `resolve` to not do that. Existing
users of `FinalDestination#resolve` are
- `Oneboxer#external_onebox`
- our onebox helper `fetch_html_doc`, which is used in amazon, standard embed
and youtube
- these folks already go through `Oneboxer#external_onebox` which already
blocks correctly
Our previous implementation used a simple `blocked_domain_array.include?(hostname)`
so some values were not matching. Additionally, in some configurations like ours, we'd used
"cat.*.dog.com" with the assumption we'd support globbing.
This change implicitly allows globbing by blocking "http://a.b.com" if "b.com" is a blocked
domain but does not actively do anything for "*".
An upcoming change might include frontend validation for values that can be inserted.
As part of /t/10298, try to remove the first flaky test in the list.
One finding is that the /t/280 topic has a very long post stream, so that may have caused some delay when rendering the topic. One way is to wait for the first expected element to load, but that doesn't scale well given how many waits we will need to add. So I chose to render a shorter topic instead.
Previously only `<div>one top element</div>` was allowed because we use `firstChild` instead of `children`.
We also want `<div>one</div><div>two</div>` to work with this method.
Natalie Tay
