mirror of
https://salsa.debian.org/freeipa-team/freeipa.git
synced 2025-01-11 00:31:56 -06:00
a001095856
Nameserver hostname passed to dnszone_add command was always treated as FQDN even though it was a relative DNS name to the new zone. All relative names were being rejected as unresolvable. Modify --name-server option processing in dnszone_add and dnszone_mod to respect FQDN/relative DNS name and do the checks accordingly. With this change, user can add a new zone "example.com" and let dnszone_add to create NS record "ns" in it, when supplied with its IP address. IP address check is more strict so that it is not entered when no forward record is created. Places misusing the option were fixed. Nameserver option now also accepts zone name, which means that NS and A record is placed to DNS zone itself. Also "@" is accepted as a nameserver name, BIND understand it also as a zone name. As a side-effect of this change, other records with hostname part (MX, KX, NS, SRV) accept "@" as valid hostname. BIND replaces it with respective zone name as well. Unit tests were updated to test the new format. https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3204 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .tx | ||
| checks | ||
| contrib | ||
| daemons | ||
| doc | ||
| init | ||
| install | ||
| ipa-client | ||
| ipalib | ||
| ipapython | ||
| ipaserver | ||
| selinux | ||
| tests | ||
| util | ||
| .bzrignore | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| API.txt | ||
| autogen.sh | ||
| BUILD.txt | ||
| Contributors.txt | ||
| COPYING | ||
| freeipa.spec.in | ||
| ipa | ||
| ipa-compliance.cron | ||
| ipa.1 | ||
| lite-server.py | ||
| make-doc | ||
| make-lint | ||
| make-test | ||
| make-testcert | ||
| makeapi | ||
| Makefile | ||
| MANIFEST.in | ||
| README | ||
| setup-client.py | ||
| setup.py | ||
| TODO | ||
| VERSION | ||
| version.m4.in | ||
IPA Server
What is it?
-----------
For efficiency, compliance and risk mitigation, organizations need to
centrally manage and correlate vital security information including:
* Identity (machine, user, virtual machines, groups, authentication
credentials)
* Policy (configuration settings, access control information)
* Audit (events, logs, analysis thereof)
Since these are not new problems. there exist many approaches and
products focused on addressing them. However, these tend to have the
following weaknesses:
* Focus on solving identity management across the enterprise has meant
less focus on policy and audit.
* Vendor focus on Web identity management problems has meant less well
developed solutions for central management of the Linux and Unix
world's vital security info. Organizations are forced to maintain
a hodgepodge of internal and proprietary solutions at high TCO.
* Proprietary security products don't easily provide access to the
vital security information they collect or manage. This makes it
difficult to synchronize and analyze effectively.
The Latest Version
------------------
Details of the latest version can be found on the IPA server project
page under <http://www.freeipa.org/>.
Documentation
-------------
The most up-to-date documentation can be found at
<http://freeipa.org/page/Documentation/>.
Quick Start
-----------
To get started quickly, start here:
<https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/wiki/QuickStartGuide>
Licensing
---------
Please see the file called COPYING.
Contacts
--------
* If you want to be informed about new code releases, bug fixes,
security fixes, general news and information about the IPA server
subscribe to the freeipa-announce mailing list at
<https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-interest/>.
* If you have a bug report please submit it at:
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com>
* If you want to participate in actively developing IPA please
subscribe to the freeipa-devel mailing list at
<https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel/> or join
us in IRC at irc://irc.freenode.net/freeipa