Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Martin Atkins
7d760c09fb core: Update EvalCountFixZeroOneBoundaryGlobal for new state types 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
James Bardin
16df9c37cf first step in core provider type replacement
Chaange ResourceProvider to providers.Interface starting from the
context, and fix all type errors.

This only replaced some of method calls directly applicable to the
providers themselves. The resource methods will follow.
2018-10-16 19:11:09 -07:00
Martin Atkins
a3403f2766 terraform: Ugly huge change to weave in new State and Plan types
Due to how often the state and plan types are referenced throughout
Terraform, there isn't a great way to switch them out gradually. As a
consequence, this huge commit gets us from the old world to a _compilable_
new world, but still has a large number of known test failures due to
key functionality being stubbed out.

The stubs here are for anything that interacts with providers, since we
now need to do the follow-up work to similarly replace the old
terraform.ResourceProvider interface with its replacement in the new
"providers" package. That work, along with work to fix the remaining
failing tests, will follow in subsequent commits.

The aim here was to replace all references to terraform.State and its
downstream types with states.State, terraform.Plan with plans.Plan,
state.State with statemgr.State, and switch to the new implementations of
the state and plan file formats. However, due to the number of times those
types are used, this also ended up affecting numerous other parts of core
such as terraform.Hook, the backend.Backend interface, and most of the CLI
commands.

Just as with 5861dbf3fc49b19587a31816eb06f511ab861bb4 before, I apologize
in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge commit while
spelunking through the commit history.
2018-10-16 19:11:09 -07:00
Martin Atkins
5281afcc07 core: Actually read provider schema for data resources
We were passing the pointer into EvalReadDataDiff here, but because it was
not also passed to EvalGetProvider it was just always nil.
2018-10-16 18:48:28 -07:00
Martin Atkins
d4285dd27f core: Attach resource and provider config schemas during graph build
This is a little awkward since we need to instantiate the providers much
earlier than before. To avoid a lot of reshuffling here we just spin each
one up and then immediately shut it down again, letting our existing init
functionality during the graph walk still do the main initialization.
2018-10-16 18:46:46 -07:00
Martin Atkins
c937c06a03 terraform: ugly huge change to weave in new HCL2-oriented types
Due to how deeply the configuration types go into Terraform Core, there
isn't a great way to switch out to HCL2 gradually. As a consequence, this
huge commit gets us from the old state to a _compilable_ new state, but
does not yet attempt to fix any tests and has a number of known missing
parts and bugs. We will continue to iterate on this in forthcoming
commits, heading back towards passing tests and making Terraform
fully-functional again.

The three main goals here are:
- Use the configuration models from the "configs" package instead of the
  older models in the "config" package, which is now deprecated and
  preserved only to help us write our migration tool.
- Do expression inspection and evaluation using the functionality of the
  new "lang" package, instead of the Interpolator type and related
  functionality in the main "terraform" package.
- Represent addresses of various objects using types in the addrs package,
  rather than hand-constructed strings. This is not critical to support
  the above, but was a big help during the implementation of these other
  points since it made it much more explicit what kind of address is
  expected in each context.

Since our new packages are built to accommodate some future planned
features that are not yet implemented (e.g. the "for_each" argument on
resources, "count"/"for_each" on modules), and since there's still a fair
amount of functionality still using old-style APIs, there is a moderate
amount of shimming here to connect new assumptions with old, hopefully in
a way that makes it easier to find and eliminate these shims later.

I apologize in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge
commit while spelunking through the commit history.
2018-10-16 18:46:46 -07:00
James Bardin
c2f3522f7d write providers to state for data resources
And update the test state strings

Destroying with no config is no longer allowed, run an exlpicit destroy
for the destroyOrder test.
2017-11-07 21:05:21 -05:00
James Bardin
b79adeae02 save resolved providers for resources to state
Use the ResourceState.Provider field to store the full name of the
provider used during apply. This field is only used when a resource is
removed from the config, and will allow that resource to be removed by
the exact same provider with which it was created.

Modify the locations which might accept the alue of the
ResourceState.Provider field to detect that the name is resolved.
2017-11-07 13:09:36 -05:00
James Bardin
a14fd0344c WIP reference providers by full name
This turned out to be a big messy commit, since the way providers are
referenced is tightly coupled throughout the code. That starts to unify
how providers are referenced, using the format output node Name method.

Add a new field to the internal resource data types called
ResolvedProvider. This is set by a new setter method SetProvider when a
resource is connected to a provider during graph creation. This allows
us to later lookup the provider instance a resource is connected to,
without requiring it to have the same module path.

The InitProvider context method now takes 2 arguments, one if the
provider type and the second is the full name of the provider. While the
provider type could still be parsed from the full name, this makes it
more explicit and, and changes to the name format won't effect this
code.
2017-11-02 15:00:06 -04:00
Chris Marchesi
7b1618efde core: Fix destroy factory in data source refresh expander 2017-05-12 15:45:06 -07:00
Chris Marchesi
b807505d55 core: New refresh graph building behaviour
Currently, the refresh graph uses the resources from state as a base,
with data sources then layered on. Config is not consulted for resources
and hence new resources that are added with count (or any new resource
from config, for that matter) do not get added to the graph during
refresh.

This is leading to issues with scale in and scale out when the same
value for count is used in both resources, and data sources that may
depend on that resource (and possibly vice versa). While the resources
exist in config and can be used, the fact that ConfigTransformer for
resources is missing means that they don't get added into the graph,
leading to "index out of range" errors and what not.

Further to that, if we add these new resources to the graph for scale
out, considerations need to be taken for scale in as well, which are not
being caught 100% by the current implementation of
NodeRefreshableDataResource. Scale-in resources should be treated as
orphans, which according to the instance-form NodeRefreshableResource
node, should be NodeDestroyableDataResource nodes, but this this logic
is currently not rolled into NodeRefreshableDataResource. This causes
issues on scale-in in the form of race-ish "index out of range" errors
again.

This commit updates the refresh graph so that StateTransformer is no
longer used as the base of the graph. Instead, we add resources from the
state and config in a hybrid fashion:

 * First off, resource nodes are added from config, but only if
   resources currently exist in state.  NodeRefreshableManagedResource
   is a new expandable resource node that will expand count and add
   orphans from state. Any count-expanded node that has config but no
   state is also transformed into a plannable resource, via a new
   ResourceRefreshPlannableTransformer.
 * The NodeRefreshableDataResource node type will now add count orphans
   as NodeDestroyableDataResource nodes. This achieves the same effect
   as if the data sources were added by StateTransformer, but ensures
   there are no races in the dependency chain, with the added benefit of
   directing these nodes straight to the proper
   NodeDestroyableDataResource node.
 * Finally, config orphans (nodes that don't exist in config anymore
   period) are then added, to complete the graph.

This should ensure as much as possible that there is a refresh graph
that best represents both the current state and config with updated
variables and counts.
2017-05-12 15:45:06 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
d59725e9fd
terraform: convert StateDeps to use new structs 2017-01-26 20:47:20 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
7c014b84b6
terraform: handle count fields for data sources 2017-01-22 16:05:10 -08:00