The layout parameter has been deprecated some time ago and now removed
in DUNE > 2.7. This commit fixes its last usage in opm-models makes it
compiler with DUNE master.
It's not possible to have `constexpr std::string`s in C++17. Taking
`std::string_view` gives conversion errors. Since this is all temporary
and will be replaced by pure runtime parameters anyway, use string
literals for the moment.
the flags which I used are
```
-pedantic \
-Wall \
-Wextra \
-Wformat-nonliteral \
-Wcast-align
-Wpointer-arith \
-Wmissing-declarations \
-Wcast-qual \
-Wshadow
-Wwrite-strings \
-Wchar-subscripts \
-Wredundant-decls \
-fstrict-overflow \
-O3 \
-march=native \
-DNDEBUG=1
```
note that some heavy filtering is not the worst idea because DUNE is
far from not emiting any warnings with these flags.
Also, there were some pesky warnings in test_ecl_output which I don't
know how to fix:
```
tests/test_ecl_output.cc:218:73: warning: missing initializer for member ‘Opm::data::Connection::effective_Kh’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
```
this is only relevant people who are masochistic enough to go beyond
`-Wall`. (note that at this warning level, there is plenty of noise from
Dune and other upstream dependencies.)
further, this cleans up the code of the parameter system and the
startup routines a bit and finally, it adds positional parameters
support to ebos as well as brief descriptions to ebos and the lens
problem.
Dune::set_singularity_limit() was removed and the ILU preconditioners
seem to have been refactored. The ILU refactoring included making the
order of the preconditioner a template parameter of the preconditioner
class, i.e., it can no longer be specified at runtime.
Note that the AMG code in the dune master currently produces quite a
few warnings because of the latter point, but as far as I can see,
there is nothing which can be done about this from outside of
dune-istl.
IMO the term "vanguard" expresses better what these classes are
supposed to do: level the ground for the cavalry. Normally this simply
means to create and distribute a grid object, but it can become quite
a bit more complicated, as exemplified by the vanguard classes of
ebos..
instead of passing a "minimal" fluid state that defines the
thermodynamic conditions on the domain boundary and the models
calculating everything they need based on this, it is now assumed that
all quantities needed by the code that computes the boundary fluxes
are defined. This simplifies the boundary flux computation code, it
allows to get rid of the `paramCache` argument for these methods and
to potentially speed things up because quantities do not get
re-calculated unconditionally.
on the flipside, this requires slightly more effort to define the
conditions at the boundary on the problem level and it makes it less
obvious which quantities are actually used. That said, one now has the
freedom to shoot oneself into the foot more easily when specifying
boundary conditions and also tools like valgrind or ASAN will normally
complain about undefined quantities if this happens.
according to wikipedia the term "heat" is the energy transferred due
to a temperature gradient, i.e., it only makes sense if such a
gradient is present and this is not necessary for the storage term.
this means that technically the term "heat conductivity" is
meaningful, but "thermal conductivity" is IMO more consistent.
this has partially already been done in opm-material and eWoms it was
pretty inconsistent, so it also requires a patch in opm-material.
it broke because of the recent refactoring of the energy material laws
in opm-material. The reason why nobody noticed is that this test
requires dune-alugrid to be compiled.
