Adding explicit input specification of water-gas ratio (RVW) and RVW output plus simulator gas-water system with salt precipitation and water evaporation for
This commit switches the debug file's records of "failed" bubble and
dew point pressure calculations from a non-unique list of linearised
Cartesian indices to a unique list of (1-based) (I,J,K) tuples.
This format is hopefully easier to read for humans.
Thanks to [at]blattms for suggesting the gatherv() helper function
which greatly simplifies the communication pattern.
Example from selected time steps in a real field case with Cartesian
dimensions 137-by-236-by-58:
- Original
Finding the dew point pressure failed for 2 cells [1467066, 1467066]
Finding the dew point pressure failed for 8 cells [1467063, 1467063, 1467066, 1467066, 1467066, 1467066, 1467066, 1467066]
- This commit
Finding the dew point pressure failed for 1 cell [(71,89,46)]
Finding the dew point pressure failed for 2 cells [(68,89,46), (71,89,46)]
This commit adds a new grid traversal that computes fluxes-presently
surface level component fluxes-for all bulk connections on the
current MPI rank. We aggregate those fluxes, if applicable, into a
container for inter-region flows, but this support could be extended
to capturing the full 3D vector flow rates for restart output if
needed.
The Flow specific PORV_RC and TMULT_RC solution arrays were tagged
as ECLIPSE compatible. Mark them as Flow specific so they do not
cause restart problems in the ECLIPSE compatible case.
We decide whether to write tracer concentrations based on the size
of the tracerConcentrations_ container. Hence we need to make sure
that its size is zero after the concentrations have been written
and now resize the container to reflect that.
Before this change only the container inside tracerConcentrations_
were moved (and hence made empty) and next tiem we passed empty
containers to the output writing functions (which in parallel
triggered an assertion).
building a whole simulator for this, and then not even
running a test for it, seems rather excessive. if a test for
index-conformance is wanted, a better approach should be taken.
This commit distinguishes the reference condition pore volume from
the dynamic, pressure (and/or temperature) dependent pore volume
value. Previously we would report the latter as the 'PORV' value in
the "Field Totals" and "FIPNUM region" reports, but this commit
switches to reporting the former instead-mostly for compatibility.
We still report the dynamic pore volume value, but now we report
this on a line of its own, before the table, using one of the forms
Field total pressure dependent pore volume = 12345 RM3
FIPNUM report region 1 pressure dependent pore volume = 123 RM3
